These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34383960)

  • 1. Evolutionary theory prediction: Response rate as a joint function of reinforcement rate and reinforcer magnitude.
    McDowell JJ; Arashanapalli S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Sep; 116(2):225-242. PubMed ID: 34383960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. All Behavior is choice: Revisiting an evolutionary theory's account of behavior on single schedules.
    McDowell JJ; Klapes B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Nov; 114(3):430-446. PubMed ID: 33025598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection dynamics in joint matching to rate and magnitude of reinforcement.
    McDowell JJ; Popa A; Calvin NT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Sep; 98(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 23008523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zebrafish choice behavior is sensitive to reinforcer rate, immediacy, and magnitude ratios.
    Kuroda T; Ritchey CM; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Sep; 116(2):182-207. PubMed ID: 34223635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Falsification of matching theory's account of single-alternative responding: Herrnstein's k varies with sucrose concentration.
    Dallery J; McDowell JJ; Lancaster JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jan; 73(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 10682338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A test of the evolutionary theory's account of punishment superimposed on single-alternative schedules.
    McDowell JJ; Klapes B; Arashanapalli S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Jan; 119(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 36416717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A test of the formal and modern theories of matching.
    Dallery J; Soto PL; McDowell JJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 16262183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling resurgence with an evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics.
    Falligant JM; Klapes B; Hagopian LP
    Behav Processes; 2022 Apr; 197():104623. PubMed ID: 35318109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feedback functions, optimization, and the relation of response rate to reinforcer rate.
    Soto PL; McDowell JJ; Dallery J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 16602376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basolateral amygdala lesions and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in concurrent chains schedules.
    Helms CM; Mitchell SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 191(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 18455812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.
    Heyman GM; Monaghan MM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):505-16. PubMed ID: 16812733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An implementation of punishment in the evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics.
    McDowell JJ; Klapes B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Sep; 112(2):128-143. PubMed ID: 31385310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of adding a second reinforcement alternative: implications for Herrnstein's interpretation of r(e).
    Soto PL; McDowell JJ; Dallery J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):185-225. PubMed ID: 16262186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law.
    Borrero CS; Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Bourret JC; Sloman KN; Samaha AL; Dallery J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 21119856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling and quantifying resurgence in the Evolutionary Theory of Behavior Dynamics.
    Klapes B; Falligant JM; Hagopian LP
    Behav Processes; 2023 May; 208():104860. PubMed ID: 36967093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative reinforcer rates and magnitudes do not control concurrent choice independently.
    Elliffe D; Davison M; Landon J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Sep; 90(2):169-85. PubMed ID: 18831124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a mechanics of adaptive behavior: evolutionary dynamics and matching theory statics.
    McDowell JJ; Popa A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):241-60. PubMed ID: 21451751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.