489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34383979)
1. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.
Türksayar AAD; Atsü SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):332-340. PubMed ID: 33909724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of cement type and abutment height on pull-off force of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns on titanium implant stock abutments: an in vitro study.
Müller L; Rauch A; Reissmann DR; Schierz O
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):592. PubMed ID: 34798850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
Taha D; Sabet A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture strength of various titanium-based, CAD-CAM and PFM implant crowns.
DuVall NB; DeReis SP; Vandewalle KS
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):522-530. PubMed ID: 33174333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture Resistance of Custom Lithium Disilicate Implant Restorations with Two Fabrication Techniques and Two Designs.
Emam M; Eldimeery A; Salah T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35904823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of abutment design on fracture resistance of resin-matrix ceramic crowns for dental implant restoration: an in vitro study.
Lin J; Cai P; Zhuo Y; Lin L; Zheng Z
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):410. PubMed ID: 37344826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical behavior of nano-hybrid composite in comparison to lithium disilicate as posterior cement-retained implant-supported crowns restoring different abutments.
Elsayed A; Yazigi C; Kern M; Chaar MS
Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e435-e442. PubMed ID: 33875247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns.
Barbosa-Júnior SA; Pereira GKR; Dapieve KS; Machado PS; Valandro LF; Schuh C; Consani RLX; Bacchi A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations.
Roberts EE; Bailey CW; Ashcraft-Olmscheid DL; Vandewalle KS
J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):644-650. PubMed ID: 29417647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
