These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34384638)
1. A comparative assessment of failures and periodontal health between 2 mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial. Węgrodzka E; Kornatowska K; Pandis N; Fudalej PS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):494-502.e1. PubMed ID: 34384638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survival of bonded lingual retainers with chemical or photo polymerization over a 2-year period: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Pandis N; Fleming PS; Kloukos D; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 23910197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and posttreatment stability. A 2-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial. Egli F; Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cornelis MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 28024770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and posttreatment stability. A 5-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial. Cornelis MA; Egli F; Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cattaneo PM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Aug; 162(2):152-161.e1. PubMed ID: 35551840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period. Bovali E; Kiliaridis S; Cornelis MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 25432250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between round multi-strand wire and rectangular wire bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Al-Maaitah EF; Alomari S; Al-Nimri K Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(2):e2321101. PubMed ID: 37222337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of maxillary and mandibular bonded retainers 10 to 15 years after orthodontic treatment: a retrospective observational study. Kocher KE; Gebistorf MC; Pandis N; Fudalej PS; Katsaros C Prog Orthod; 2019 Jul; 20(1):28. PubMed ID: 31328248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers : A prospective short-term study. Kartal Y; Kaya B; Polat-Özsoy Ö J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jan; 82(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32780168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers. Eroglu AK; Baka ZM; Arslan U Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there a difference among different bonded retainers in regard to survival rate? Mheissen S; Spineli LM Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):156-157. PubMed ID: 36526843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 2: periodontal health outcomes after 12 months. Storey M; Forde K; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 29059293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Forde K; Storey M; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of efficacy of thermoplastic retainer with round and rectangular bonded lingual wire retainer in the mandible two years after orthodontic treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Kanizaj Ugrin S; Špalj S Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(3):183. PubMed ID: 38424224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fixed and removable orthodontic retainers and periodontal health. Madurantakam P; Kumar S Evid Based Dent; 2017 Dec; 18(4):103-104. PubMed ID: 29269822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Periodontal effects and survival rates of different mandibular retainers: comparison of bonding technique and wire thickness. Gökçe B; Kaya B Eur J Orthod; 2019 Nov; 41(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 31365926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers. Al-Nimri K; Al Habashneh R; Obeidat M Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20043549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 2: periodontal health and microbial biofilm assessment. Jasim ES; Kadhum AS Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39312715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Artun J; Spadafora AT; Shapiro PA Eur J Orthod; 1997 Oct; 19(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 9386336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term follow-up of maxillary fixed retention: survival rate and periodontal health. Dietrich P; Patcas R; Pandis N; Eliades T Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 25086911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study. Ferreira LA; Sapata DM; Provenzano MGA; Hayacibara RM; Ramos AL Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Aug; 24(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 31390451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]