These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34385574)

  • 21. Socio-economic variables improve accuracy and change spatial predictions in species distribution models.
    Bramorska B; Komar E; Maugeri L; Ruczyński I; Żmihorski M
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 May; 924():171588. PubMed ID: 38461982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing the multi-scale predictive ability of ecosystem functional attributes for species distribution modelling.
    Arenas-Castro S; Gonçalves J; Alves P; Alcaraz-Segura D; Honrado JP
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199292. PubMed ID: 29912933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predicting spatial variations of tree species richness in tropical forests from high-resolution remote sensing.
    Fricker GA; Wolf JA; Saatchi SS; Gillespie TW
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Oct; 25(7):1776-89. PubMed ID: 26591445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Seeing from space makes sense: Novel earth observation variables accurately map species distributions over Himalaya.
    Satish KV; Dugesar V; Pandey MK; Srivastava PK; Pharswan DS; Wani ZA
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116428. PubMed ID: 36272289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biotic homogenisation and differentiation as directional change in beta diversity: synthesising driver-response relationships to develop conceptual models across ecosystems.
    Rolls RJ; Deane DC; Johnson SE; Heino J; Anderson MJ; Ellingsen KE
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Aug; 98(4):1388-1423. PubMed ID: 37072381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identifying climate refugia for high-elevation Alpine birds under current climate warming predictions.
    Brambilla M; Rubolini D; Appukuttan O; Calvi G; Karger DN; Kmecl P; Mihelič T; Sattler T; Seaman B; Teufelbauer N; Wahl J; Celada C
    Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Jul; 28(14):4276-4291. PubMed ID: 35441422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. From species distributions to meta-communities.
    Thuiller W; Pollock LJ; Gueguen M; Münkemüller T
    Ecol Lett; 2015 Dec; 18(12):1321-8. PubMed ID: 26439311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cross-scale monitoring of habitat suitability changes using satellite time series and ecological niche models.
    Arenas-Castro S; Sillero N
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 784():147172. PubMed ID: 34088022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multi-scale approach for predicting fish species distributions across coral reef seascapes.
    Pittman SJ; Brown KA
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e20583. PubMed ID: 21637787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.
    Gil M; Ramil F; AgÍs JA
    Zootaxa; 2020 Nov; 4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. PubMed ID: 33311142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing and synthesizing quantitative distribution models and qualitative vulnerability assessments to project marine species distributions under climate change.
    Allyn AJ; Alexander MA; Franklin BS; Massiot-Granier F; Pershing AJ; Scott JD; Mills KE
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231595. PubMed ID: 32298349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Legume diversity patterns in West Central Africa: influence of species biology on distribution models.
    de la Estrella M; Mateo RG; Wieringa JJ; Mackinder B; Muñoz J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41526. PubMed ID: 22911808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A hyper-temporal remote sensing protocol for high-resolution mapping of ecological sites.
    Maynard JJ; Karl JW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175201. PubMed ID: 28414731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models.
    Guisan A; Thuiller W
    Ecol Lett; 2005 Sep; 8(9):993-1009. PubMed ID: 34517687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes.
    Muscatello A; Elith J; Kujala H
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1309-1320. PubMed ID: 33236808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Niche variability and its consequences for species distribution modeling.
    Michel MJ; Knouft JH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44932. PubMed ID: 22970325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta.
    Hammond HEJ; García-Tejero S; Pohl GR; Langor DW; Spence JR
    Zookeys; 2021; 1044():951-991. PubMed ID: 34183898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do traits of plant species predict the efficacy of species distribution models for finding new occurrences?
    McCune JL; Rosner-Katz H; Bennett JR; Schuster R; Kharouba HM
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Jun; 10(11):5001-5014. PubMed ID: 32551077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Combining α - and β -diversity models to fill gaps in our knowledge of biodiversity.
    Mokany K; Harwood TD; Overton JM; Barker GM; Ferrier S
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Oct; 14(10):1043-51. PubMed ID: 21812884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.