These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34386553)

  • 1. The Clinical Impact of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Maia S; Falcão D; Silva J; Pedroto I
    GE Port J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 28(4):243-252. PubMed ID: 34386553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall Scores for prediction of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes in Chinese patients.
    Lu M; Sun G; Huang H; Zhang X; Xu Y; Chen S; Song Y; Li X; Lv B; Ren J; Chen X; Zhang H; Mo C; Wang Y; Yang Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(21):e15716. PubMed ID: 31124950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Two Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Taiwanese Population.
    Wang CH; Hung MS; Wu KH; Chen YC
    J Acute Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):115-121. PubMed ID: 32995182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Custovic N; Husic-Selimovic A; Srsen N; Prohic D
    Med Arch; 2020 Aug; 74(4):270-274. PubMed ID: 33041443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Taslidere B; Sonmez E; Özcan AB; Mehmetaj L; Keskin EB; Gulen B
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford score and full Rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Mokhtare M; Bozorgi V; Agah S; Nikkhah M; Faghihi A; Boghratian A; Shalbaf N; Khanlari A; Seifmanesh H
    Clin Exp Gastroenterol; 2016; 9():337-343. PubMed ID: 27826205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.
    Martínez-Cara JG; Jiménez-Rosales R; Úbeda-Muñoz M; de Hierro ML; de Teresa J; Redondo-Cerezo E
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Yang HM; Jeon SW; Jung JT; Lee DW; Ha CY; Park KS; Lee SH; Yang CH; Park JH; Park YS;
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jan; 31(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 26211939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Performance of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score in Predicting Clinical Interventions in Patients with Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Vietnamese Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
    Quach DT; Dao NH; Dinh MC; Nguyen CH; Ho LX; Nguyen ND; Le QD; Vo CM; Le SK; Hiyama T
    Gut Liver; 2016 May; 10(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 26601829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Chang A; Ouejiaraphant C; Akarapatima K; Rattanasupa A; Prachayakul V
    Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?
    Budimir I; Stojsavljević S; Baršić N; Bišćanin A; Mirošević G; Bohnec S; Kirigin LS; Pavić T; Ljubičić N
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 23(41):7450-7458. PubMed ID: 29151699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.