462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34389164)
1. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.
Perry R; Barbosa JP; Perry I; Barbosa J
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 38492067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.
Haruštiak T; Jaroščiaková S; Šnajdauf M; Pazdro A; Lischke R
Rozhl Chir; 2023; 102(11):422-429. PubMed ID: 38290818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
Capovilla G; Hadzijusufovic E; Tagkalos E; Froiio C; Berlth F; Mann C; Staubitz J; Uzun E; Lang H; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Aug; 35(8):. PubMed ID: 34979549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).
van der Sluis PC; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Babic B; Uzun E; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32072382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Tan Z; Zhang X; Wang X; Fu J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):995-998. PubMed ID: 27680066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy have superiority over thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy in lymph node dissection?
Li XK; Xu Y; Zhou H; Cong ZZ; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Shen Y
Dis Esophagus; 2021 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 32582945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using a four-arm platform: experience, technique and cautions during early procedure development.
Sarkaria IS; Rizk NP; Finley DJ; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Huang J; Rusch VW
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 May; 43(5):e107-15. PubMed ID: 23371971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy - a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques.
Grimminger PP; Staubitz JI; Perez D; Ghadban T; Reeh M; Scognamiglio P; Izbicki JR; Biebl M; Fuchs H; Bruns CJ; Lang H; Becker T; Egberts JH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Oct; 25(10):2463-2469. PubMed ID: 34145494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of the robotic abdominal phase during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from a high-volume center.
de Groot EM; Goense L; Kingma BF; van den Berg JW; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 36203109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.
Weindelmayer J; De Pasqual CA; Turolo C; Gervasi MC; Sacco M; Bencivenga M; Giacopuzzi S
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 36971002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
