214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34389498)
1. Comparison of periprosthetic bone mineral density between two types of short-stems in total hip arthroplasty with a mean follow-up of 4 years.
Djebara AE; El Yagoubi A; Mertl P; El Fatayri B; Dehl M; Gabrion A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 108(1):103044. PubMed ID: 34389498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Femoral Bone Mineral Density Changes around 3 Common Designs of Cementless Stems after Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Liu Y; Wei WX; Zeng Y; Ma J; Yang J; Shen B
Orthop Surg; 2022 Jun; 14(6):1059-1070. PubMed ID: 35466536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.
Rahmy AI; Gosens T; Blake GM; Tonino A; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14661072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol.
Wu XD; Chen Y; Wang ZY; Li YJ; Zhu ZL; Tao YZ; Chen H; Cheng Q; Huang W
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(39):e12560. PubMed ID: 30278556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short to Midterm Follow-Up of Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density after Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Ribbed Anatomic Stem.
Wu XD; Tian M; He Y; Chen H; Chen Y; Mishra R; Liu W; Huang W
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():3085258. PubMed ID: 31346514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Periprosthetic bone remodeling around short stem.
Synder M; Krajewski K; Sibinski M; Drobniewski M
Orthopedics; 2015 Mar; 38(3 Suppl):S40-5. PubMed ID: 25826631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Periprosthetic bone remodeling of short cementless femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
Yan SG; Li D; Yin S; Hua X; Tang J; Schmidutz F
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Nov; 96(47):e8806. PubMed ID: 29381984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling After Novel Short-Stem Neck-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Tran P; Zhang BX; Lade JA; Pianta RM; Unni RP; Haw CS
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2530-2535. PubMed ID: 27236743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Proximal Femoral Bone Mineral Density in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 3-Arm Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hooper G; Thompson D; Frampton C; Lash N; Sharr J; Fulker D; Gilchrist N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Mar; 106(6):508-516. PubMed ID: 38113306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bone remodelling around short stem and conventional straight stem in total hip replacement: a prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study.
Lacko M; Filip V; Gharaibeh A; Lackova A; Folvarsky M; Zamborsky R
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2021; 122(8):548-554. PubMed ID: 34282619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stem anteversion affects periprosthetic bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty.
Hayashi S; Hashimoto S; Kanzaki N; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M
Hip Int; 2016 May; 26(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 27102558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femoral bone remodeling after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a prospective densitometric study.
Hochreiter J; Mattiassich G; Ortmaier R; Steinmair M; Anderl C
Int Orthop; 2020 Apr; 44(4):753-759. PubMed ID: 31965311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unstable versus stable uncemented femoral stems: a radiological study of periprosthetic bone changes in two types of uncemented stems with different concepts of fixation.
Bodén H; Adolphson P; Oberg M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jul; 124(6):382-92. PubMed ID: 15112084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation.
Nagi ON; Kumar S; Aggarwal S
Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16570896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between Collum Femoris-Preserving Stems and Ribbed Stems in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Liu Z; Liu B; Liu S; Li M; Chen X; Han Y
Med Sci Monit; 2020 May; 26():e924668. PubMed ID: 32413021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contact states with femoral cortical bone and periprosthetic bone mineral density changes differ between traditional and newly introduced fully hydroxyapatite-coated stems.
Ohyama Y; Minoda Y; Masuda S; Sugama R; Ohta Y; Nakamura H
Bone Joint J; 2024 Jun; 106-B(6):548-554. PubMed ID: 38821498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Periprosthetic bone mineral density with a cementless triple tapered stem is dependent on daily activity.
Hayashi S; Nishiyama T; Fujishiro T; Kanzaki N; Hashimoto S; Kurosaka M
Int Orthop; 2012 Jun; 36(6):1137-42. PubMed ID: 22127382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective cohort study on the short collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem using RSA and DXA. Primary stability but no prevention of proximal bone loss in 27 patients followed for 2 years.
Lazarinis S; Mattsson P; Milbrink J; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
Acta Orthop; 2013 Feb; 84(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 23343375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No Clinically Important Differences in Thigh Pain or Bone Loss Between Short Stems and Conventional-length Stems in THA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Won SH; Park JW; Lee YK; Ha YC; Koo KH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Apr; 479(4):767-777. PubMed ID: 33009239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
