These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3438973)

  • 1. [Status of tonal hearing of deaf schoolchildren after long-term audiological training].
    Kuz'micheva EP
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1987; (6):33-5. PubMed ID: 3438973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Thresholds of the minimal perceptible differences in coupled sounds and speech intelligibility in hard of hearing schoolchildren].
    Moroz BS; Sachenko SV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1980; (3):35-9. PubMed ID: 7385523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Relation between tone and speech perception in noise-induced hearing loss--determination of characteristics].
    Tymnik G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Oct; 72(10):493-6. PubMed ID: 8267826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnosis of speech and hearing disorders in children with the aid of play tonal audiometry].
    Liakh GS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1980; (5):70-3. PubMed ID: 7414834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants compared with children with conventional hearing aids.
    Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S129-30. PubMed ID: 9391631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical implications of a damaged cochlea: pure tone thresholds vs information-carrying capacity.
    Halpin C; Rauch SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Apr; 140(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 19328332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are cochlear implants indicated in prelingually deaf adults?
    Manrique N; Huarte A; Molina M; Perez N; Espinosa JM; Cervera-Paz FJ; Miranda I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():192-4. PubMed ID: 7668632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.
    Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Optimal acoustic conditions for binaural speech perception by patients with asymmetrical neurosensory hearing loss].
    Belov IM; Grechukhina TV; Kuks EN; Mal'tseva NV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981; (2):6-9. PubMed ID: 7222371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Choice of criteria for classifying the forms of hearing loss applicable to the aims of hearing aids].
    Bazarov VG; Moroz BS; Tishchenko NI; Gekht IuK
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981; (4):21-6. PubMed ID: 7303367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Characteristics of the state of hearing in patients with adhesive otitis media after hearing improvement operations].
    Radugin KB
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1984; (4):6-10. PubMed ID: 6474680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Functional assessment of cochlear nerve and hearing].
    Perrot X; Fischer C
    Neurochirurgie; 2009 Apr; 55(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 19298983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiological evaluation of twenty patients receiving pentoxifylline and prednisone after sudden deafness: prospective study.
    de Barros FA; Penido NO; Ramos HV; Sanchez ML; Fukuda Y
    Int Tinnitus J; 2003; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14763324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From hearing screening to cochlear implantation: cochlear implants in children under 3 years of age.
    Profant M; Kabátová Z; Simková L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 18368567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some relationships between hearing aid frequency response and speech discrimination of profoundly deaf children. Pilot study.
    Dyrlund O
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 3232020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in patients after successful surgery for unilateral congenital ear anomalies.
    Snik FM; Teunissen B; Cremers WR
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Aug; 104(8 Pt 1):1029-34. PubMed ID: 8052068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results and outcomes in ossiculoplasty.
    Monsell EM
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 27(4):835-40. PubMed ID: 7984379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.