BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34389943)

  • 21. How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China.
    Hao Y; Wu Y; Wu H; Ren S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Mar; 27(8):7835-7850. PubMed ID: 31889284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and environmental pollution: an empirical study based on threshold effects for different Chinese regions.
    Wang H; Liu H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(6):5394-5409. PubMed ID: 30607844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and haze pollution: empirical evidence from China.
    Guan Y; Zhai Z; Wang Y; Wu D; Yu L; Lei Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(18):27571-27584. PubMed ID: 34981383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Foreign Direct Investment, Regional Innovation, and Green Economic Efficiency: An Empirical Test Based on the Investigation of Intermediary Effect and Threshold Effect.
    Wu YQ; Lu HX; Liao XL; Liu JB; Zhu JM
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():7348599. PubMed ID: 34630551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does Chinese foreign direct investment harm CO2 emissions in the Belt and Road Economies.
    Shinwari R; Wang Y; Maghyereh A; Awartani B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(26):39528-39544. PubMed ID: 35103938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The green halo effect of China's OFDI: evidence from countries along the Belt and Road.
    Cai X; Zhao Y; Wu X; Ge D; Long X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(26):68290-68312. PubMed ID: 37118397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship between FDI, fiscal expenditure and green total-factor productivity in China: From the perspective of spatial spillover.
    Wang KL; He S; Zhang FQ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250798. PubMed ID: 33930053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of FDI on environmental pollution in China: evidence from spatial panel data.
    An T; Xu C; Liao X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(32):44085-44097. PubMed ID: 33846915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Environmental courts and foreign direct investments: evidence from China.
    Huang X; Liu W; Cao Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(21):31400-31412. PubMed ID: 35001273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of foreign direct investment on green innovation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese provinces.
    Zhong S; Zhou Z; Jing H
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0298455. PubMed ID: 38354170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How does foreign direct investment improve urban air quality?
    Li R; Shen Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(15):43665-43676. PubMed ID: 36662431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can China's Environmental Regulations Effectively Reduce Pollution Emissions?
    Chen X; Chen Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33925668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of foreign direct investment on sustainable development in China.
    Ayamba EC; Haibo C; Abdul-Rahaman AR; Serwaa OE; Osei-Agyemang A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jul; 27(20):25625-25637. PubMed ID: 32356063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Environmental Regulation, Two-Way Foreign Direct Investment, and Green Innovation Efficiency in China's Manufacturing Industry.
    Feng Z; Zeng B; Ming Q
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30347639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of the spatial agglomeration of foreign direct investment on green total factor productivity of Chinese cities.
    Yu D; Li X; Yu J; Li H
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 290():112666. PubMed ID: 33910073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Moderating role of institutional quality in validation of pollution haven hypothesis in BRICS: a new evidence by using DCCE approach.
    Chaudhry IS; Yin W; Ali SA; Faheem M; Abbas Q; Farooq F; Ur Rahman S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(6):9193-9202. PubMed ID: 34494199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inward foreign direct investment, outward foreign direct investment, and carbon dioxide emission intensity-threshold regression analysis based on interprovincial panel data.
    Cai L; Firdousi SF; Li C; Luo Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(34):46147-46160. PubMed ID: 33415616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Governance, financial development and China's outward foreign direct investment.
    Gao C; Wen Y; Yang D
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270581. PubMed ID: 35771853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring the moderating role of digital finance in the two-way foreign direct investment and green technology innovation nexus: an empirical evidence from China.
    Jin Q; Wang K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(7):10473-10482. PubMed ID: 38198095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Environmental regulation, foreign investment, and green innovation: a case study from China.
    Cao X; Zhang Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):7218-7235. PubMed ID: 36036348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.