These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34390131)

  • 1. Multiple imputation analysis of Miettinen-Nurminen interval for difference in proportions.
    Lu K; Guo H
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 21(1):196-208. PubMed ID: 34390131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence interval of risk difference by different statistical methods and its impact on the study conclusion in antibiotic non-inferiority trials.
    Bai AD; Komorowski AS; Lo CKL; Tandon P; Li XX; Mokashi V; Cvetkovic A; Findlater A; Liang L; Tomlinson G; Loeb M; Mertz D;
    Trials; 2021 Oct; 22(1):708. PubMed ID: 34656155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.
    Newcombe RG
    Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):873-90. PubMed ID: 9595617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of Miettinen-Nurminen score method with or without stratification in R.
    Lee MH; Bae KS
    Transl Clin Pharmacol; 2022 Sep; 30(3):155-162. PubMed ID: 36247746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An improved score-type confidence interval for stratified risk differences involving rare events.
    Hu Y; Lu K; Xie L; Zhu W
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(3):492-507. PubMed ID: 36585125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quasi-exact method for the confidence intervals of the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases.
    Chen X
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(6):943-56. PubMed ID: 11870826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Miettinen and Nurminen score statistics revisited.
    Martín Andrés A; Gayá Moreno F; Álvarez Hernández M; Herranz Tejedor I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Feb; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38335320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Number of imputations needed to stabilize estimated treatment difference in longitudinal data analysis.
    Lu K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):674-690. PubMed ID: 25305196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of 7 methods for sample size determination based on confidence interval estimation for a single proportion].
    Yu M; Shi X; Zou B; An S
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2023 Jan; 43(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 36856217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals for the difference between independent binomial proportions: comparison using a graphical approach and moving averages.
    Laud PJ; Dane A
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(5):294-308. PubMed ID: 25163425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approximate confidence intervals for the difference in proportions for partially observed binary data.
    Das U; Basu R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Mar; 31(3):488-509. PubMed ID: 34841987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of two binomial proportions in noninferiority confirmatory trials.
    Lakkis H; Lakkis A
    Pharm Stat; 2024; 23(2):257-275. PubMed ID: 38083906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for principal component loadings in the presence of missing data: a multiple-imputation approach.
    van Ginkel JR; Kiers HA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):498-515. PubMed ID: 21973098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-inferiority test and confidence interval for the difference in correlated proportions in diagnostic procedures based on multiple raters.
    Saeki H; Tango T
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3313-27. PubMed ID: 21953516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.
    Maruo K; Kawai N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple imputation confidence intervals for the mean of the discrete distributions for incomplete data.
    Lee CH; Wang H
    Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1172-1190. PubMed ID: 34786744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on effective sample size for constructing confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions.
    Liu GF
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 22337507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equal-tailed confidence intervals for comparison of rates.
    Laud PJ
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Sep; 16(5):334-348. PubMed ID: 28639426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of confidence intervals for a cumulative proportion to enable decisions at interim reviews of single-arm trials.
    Weir IR; Harrison LJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2024 Mar; 138():107453. PubMed ID: 38253253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regression multiple imputation for missing data analysis.
    Yu L; Liu L; Peace KE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2647-2664. PubMed ID: 32131673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.