These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34390193)

  • 1. Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews.
    van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Leeflang MMG; Olabarriaga SD
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):831-841. PubMed ID: 34390193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring the impact of screening automation on meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Norman CR; Leeflang MMG; Porcher R; Névéol A
    Syst Rev; 2019 Oct; 8(1):243. PubMed ID: 31661028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated screening of research studies for systematic reviews using study characteristics.
    Tsafnat G; Glasziou P; Karystianis G; Coiera E
    Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):64. PubMed ID: 29695296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.
    Bannach-Brown A; Przybyła P; Thomas J; Rice ASC; Ananiadou S; Liao J; Macleod MR
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):23. PubMed ID: 30646959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
    Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine learning for identifying relevant publications in updates of systematic reviews of diagnostic test studies.
    Lange T; Schwarzer G; Datzmann T; Binder H
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):506-515. PubMed ID: 33720520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol.
    Zhang Y; Liang S; Feng Y; Wang Q; Sun F; Chen S; Yang Y; He X; Zhu H; Pan H
    Syst Rev; 2022 Jan; 11(1):11. PubMed ID: 35031074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
    Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Vali Y; Leeflang MMG; Bossuyt PMM
    Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 10(1):191. PubMed ID: 34174958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?
    O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Gilbert SB; Hutton B
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 31215463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and N-Terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) as Diagnostic Tests in Adults With Suspected Heart Failure: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2021; 21(2):1-125. PubMed ID: 34055110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates.
    Surian D; Dunn AG; Orenstein L; Bashir R; Coiera E; Bourgeois FT
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Mar; 79():32-40. PubMed ID: 29410356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.
    Gates A; Gates M; Sebastianski M; Guitard S; Elliott SA; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32493228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(3):1-55. PubMed ID: 23074406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aligning text mining and machine learning algorithms with best practices for study selection in systematic literature reviews.
    Popoff E; Besada M; Jansen JP; Cope S; Kanters S
    Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 9(1):293. PubMed ID: 33308292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical utility of serologic testing for celiac disease in ontario: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(21):1-111. PubMed ID: 23074399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.