These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34390316)

  • 1. Level of patient comfort and measurement reproducibility of three different probes: A cross-sectional study.
    Flores-Rodrigo D; Meza-Mauricio J; Retamal-Valdes B; Mayta-Tovalino F; Mendoza-Azpur G
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May; 20(2):301-307. PubMed ID: 34390316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements.
    Grossi SG; Dunford RG; Ho A; Koch G; Machtei EE; Genco RJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Jul; 31(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 8858537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and reproducibility of two manual periodontal probes. An in vitro study.
    Buduneli E; Aksoy O; Köse T; Atilla G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 15367182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth.
    Andrade R; Espinoza M; Gómez EM; Espinoza JR; Cruz E
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22344339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets.
    Rams TE; Slots J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 8181912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical study of an electronic constant force periodontal probe.
    Tupta-Veselicky L; Famili P; Ceravolo FJ; Zullo T
    J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 8083795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periodontal probe precision using 4 different periodontal probes.
    Mayfield L; Bratthall G; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Feb; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 8849842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement by an experimental periodontal probe incorporating optical fiber sensor.
    Ishihata K; Wakabayashi N; Wadachi J; Akizuki T; Izumi Y; Takakuda K; Igarashi Y
    J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 21574830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of automated periodontal probing around teeth and osseointegrated oral implants.
    Christensen MM; Joss A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):455-64. PubMed ID: 9555204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.
    Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Periodontal pocket measurements with a modified Plast-o-Probe and a metal probe.
    Sanderink RB; Mörmann WH; Barbakow F
    J Clin Periodontol; 1983 Jan; 10(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 6572631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a conventional probe with electronic and manual pressure-regulated probes.
    Perry DA; Taggart EJ; Leung A; Newburn E
    J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):908-13. PubMed ID: 7823271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of different manual periodontal probes on periodontal measurements.
    Holtfreter B; Alte D; Schwahn C; Desvarieux M; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 39(11):1032-41. PubMed ID: 22924328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
    Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference?
    Khan SM; Blanchard SB; Dowsett SA; Eckert GJ; Kowolik MJ
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1099-103. PubMed ID: 16805670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved diagnostics: clinical evaluation of a color-coded, polymeric periodontal probe.
    Kazmierczak MD; Ciancio SG; Mather M; Dangler LV; Troullos ES
    Clin Prev Dent; 1992; 14(4):24-8. PubMed ID: 1521399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of probes for microbial contamination following use in periodontal pockets of various depths.
    Holt LA; Williams KB; Cobb CM; Keselyak NT; Jamison CL; Brand VS
    J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 15088872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement using a constant-force electronic probe: analysis of inter- and intraexaminer variability.
    Araujo MW; Hovey KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-40. PubMed ID: 14974813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.