These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34391422)

  • 1. Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis.
    Scarf VL; Yu S; Viney R; Cheah SL; Dahlen H; Sibbritt D; Thornton C; Tracy S; Homer C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Aug; 21(1):816. PubMed ID: 34391422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mapping the trajectories for women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2000 and 2012.
    Scarf VL; Viney R; Yu S; Foureur M; Rossiter C; Dahlen H; Thornton C; Cheah SL; Homer CSE
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Dec; 19(1):513. PubMed ID: 31864317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cost of vaginal birth at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital setting in New South Wales: A micro-costing study.
    Scarf VL; Yu S; Viney R; Lavis L; Dahlen H; Foureur M; Homer C
    Women Birth; 2020 May; 33(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 31227444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Birthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected data.
    Homer CS; Thornton C; Scarf VL; Ellwood DA; Oats JJ; Foureur MJ; Sibbritt D; McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Dahlen HG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jun; 14():206. PubMed ID: 24929250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of planned birth in a birth centre compared with alternative planned places of birth: results of the Dutch Birth Centre study.
    Hitzert M; Hermus MM; Boesveld II; Franx A; van der Pal-de Bruin KK; Steegers EE; van den Akker-van Marle EM
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016960. PubMed ID: 28893750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Costing Alternative Birth Settings for Women at Low Risk of Complications: A Systematic Review.
    Scarf V; Catling C; Viney R; Homer C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149463. PubMed ID: 26891444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths.
    Jackson M; Dahlen H; Schmied V
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):561-7. PubMed ID: 22300611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
    Hermus MAA; Hitzert M; Boesveld IC; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Dommelen PV; Franx A; Graaf JP; Lith JMMV; Luurssen-Masurel N; Steegers EAP; Wiegers TA; Bruin KMVP
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e016958. PubMed ID: 29150465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 years.
    Catling-Paull C; Coddington RL; Foureur MJ; Homer CS; ;
    Med J Aust; 2013 Jun; 198(11):616-20. PubMed ID: 23919710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 - 2012: a linked population data study.
    Homer CSE; Cheah SL; Rossiter C; Dahlen HG; Ellwood D; Foureur MJ; Forster DA; McLachlan HL; Oats JJN; Sibbritt D; Thornton C; Scarf VL
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e029192. PubMed ID: 31662359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data.
    Davies-Tuck ML; Wallace EM; Davey MA; Veitch V; Oats J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Sep; 18(1):357. PubMed ID: 30176816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.
    Schroeder L; Patel N; Keeler M; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Macfarlane AJ
    Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():28-35. PubMed ID: 27984773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why do women choose homebirth in Australia? A national survey.
    Sassine H; Burns E; Ormsby S; Dahlen HG
    Women Birth; 2021 Jul; 34(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 32636161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students.
    Stoll KH; Hauck YL; Hall WA
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):e33-8. PubMed ID: 26319505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting kicked off the program: Women's experiences of antenatal exclusion from publicly-funded homebirth in Australia.
    Coddington R; Fox D; Scarf V; Catling C
    Women Birth; 2023 Feb; 36(1):e179-e185. PubMed ID: 35764492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experiences of women who planned birth in a birth centre compared to alternative planned places of birth. Results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
    Hitzert M; Hermus MA; Scheerhagen M; Boesveld IC; Wiegers TA; van den Akker-van Marle ME; van Dommelen P; van der Pal-de Bruin KM; de Graaf JP
    Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():70-8. PubMed ID: 27428101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Birthing outside the system: the motivation behind the choice to freebirth or have a homebirth with risk factors in Australia.
    Jackson MK; Schmied V; Dahlen HG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Apr; 20(1):254. PubMed ID: 32345236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting.
    Tilden EL; Cheyney M; Guise JM; Emeis C; Lapidus J; Biel FM; Wiedrick J; Snowden JM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):403.e1-403.e8. PubMed ID: 27956202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The characteristics of women who birth at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital labour ward: A study of a nationally-representative sample of 1835 pregnant women.
    Steel A; Adams J; Frawley J; Broom A; Sibbritt D
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2015 Oct; 6(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 26842635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birth centres and the national maternity services review: response to consumer demand or compromise?
    Dahlen H; Jackson M; Schmied V; Tracy S; Priddis H
    Women Birth; 2011 Dec; 24(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 21167799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.