These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34391475)

  • 21. Development of a machine-learning model to predict Gibbs free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
    Biophys Chem; 2018 Sep; 240():63-69. PubMed ID: 29906639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of machine-learning scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
    Wójcikowski M; Ballester PJ; Siedlecki P
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():46710. PubMed ID: 28440302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computational Prediction of Binding Affinity for CDK2-ligand Complexes. A Protein Target for Cancer Drug Discovery.
    Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo Junior WF
    Curr Med Chem; 2022; 29(14):2438-2455. PubMed ID: 34365938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Binding Affinity Prediction by Pairwise Function Based on Neural Network.
    Zhu F; Zhang X; Allen JE; Jones D; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2766-2772. PubMed ID: 32338892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A New Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction and De Novo Drug Design.
    Limbu S; Dakshanamurthy S
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
    Lu J; Hou X; Wang C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4540-4549. PubMed ID: 31638801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.
    Yang C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(11):2696-2712. PubMed ID: 35579568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy.
    Bjerrum EJ
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Jun; 62():133-44. PubMed ID: 27179709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SE-OnionNet: A Convolution Neural Network for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Wang S; Liu D; Ding M; Du Z; Zhong Y; Song T; Zhu J; Zhao R
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():607824. PubMed ID: 33737946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
    Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. K
    Jiménez J; Škalič M; Martínez-Rosell G; De Fabritiis G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Feb; 58(2):287-296. PubMed ID: 29309725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of CDK-targeted scoring functions for prediction of binding affinity.
    Levin NMB; Pintro VO; Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Mattos BB; de Castro Silvério A; de Azevedo WF
    Biophys Chem; 2018 Apr; 235():1-8. PubMed ID: 29407904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accelerating AutoDock Vina with GPUs.
    Tang S; Chen R; Lin M; Lin Q; Zhu Y; Ding J; Hu H; Ling M; Wu J
    Molecules; 2022 May; 27(9):. PubMed ID: 35566391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Machine-learning scoring functions trained on complexes dissimilar to the test set already outperform classical counterparts on a blind benchmark.
    Li H; Lu G; Sze KH; Su X; Chan WY; Leung KS
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34169324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Convolutional neural network scoring and minimization in the D3R 2017 community challenge.
    Sunseri J; King JE; Francoeur PG; Koes DR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 29992528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. OnionNet: a Multiple-Layer Intermolecular-Contact-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Zheng L; Fan J; Mu Y
    ACS Omega; 2019 Oct; 4(14):15956-15965. PubMed ID: 31592466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening.
    Quiroga R; Villarreal MA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155183. PubMed ID: 27171006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.