1379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34391509)
21. The Stockholm-3 Model for Prostate Cancer Detection: Algorithm Update, Biomarker Contribution, and Reflex Test Potential.
Ström P; Nordström T; Aly M; Egevad L; Grönberg H; Eklund M
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):204-210. PubMed ID: 29331214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The GÖTEBORG prostate cancer screening 2 trial: a prospective, randomised, population-based prostate cancer screening trial with prostate-specific antigen testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.
Kohestani K; Månsson M; Arnsrud Godtman R; Stranne J; Wallström J; Carlsson S; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Scand J Urol; 2021 Apr; 55(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 33612068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Identifying Prostate Cancer Among Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.
Nordström T; Engel JC; Bergman M; Egevad L; Aly M; Eklund M; Palsdottir T; Grönberg H
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Feb; 24():11-16. PubMed ID: 34337490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of replacing PSA with Stockholm3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in a healthcare system - the Stavanger experience.
Viste E; Vinje CA; Lid TG; Skeie S; Evjen-Olsen Ø; Nordström T; Thorsen O; Gilje B; Janssen EAM; Kjosavik SR
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2020 Sep; 38(3):315-322. PubMed ID: 32772613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An Evaluation of Screening Pathways Using a Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen: Results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor M; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 6(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 37080821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.
Rouvière O; Puech P; Renard-Penna R; Claudon M; Roy C; Mège-Lechevallier F; Decaussin-Petrucci M; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Magaud L; Remontet L; Ruffion A; Colombel M; Crouzet S; Schott AM; Lemaitre L; Rabilloud M; Grenier N;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):100-109. PubMed ID: 30470502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric MRI to diagnose prostate cancer (CADMUS): a prospective, multicentre, paired-cohort, confirmatory study.
Grey ADR; Scott R; Shah B; Acher P; Liyanage S; Pavlou M; Omar R; Chinegwundoh F; Patki P; Shah TT; Hamid S; Ghei M; Gilbert K; Campbell D; Brew-Graves C; Arumainayagam N; Chapman A; McLeavy L; Karatziou A; Alsaadi Z; Collins T; Freeman A; Eldred-Evans D; Bertoncelli-Tanaka M; Tam H; Ramachandran N; Madaan S; Winkler M; Arya M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Mar; 23(3):428-438. PubMed ID: 35240084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS).
Olsson H; Nordström T; Jäderling F; Egevad L; Vigneswaran HT; Annerstedt M; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Lantz A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 May; 113(5):632-640. PubMed ID: 32866231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective prostate cancer screening programme for men with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (IMPACT): initial results from an international prospective study.
Bancroft EK; Page EC; Brook MN; Thomas S; Taylor N; Pope J; McHugh J; Jones AB; Karlsson Q; Merson S; Ong KR; Hoffman J; Huber C; Maehle L; Grindedal EM; Stormorken A; Evans DG; Rothwell J; Lalloo F; Brady AF; Bartlett M; Snape K; Hanson H; James P; McKinley J; Mascarenhas L; Syngal S; Ukaegbu C; Side L; Thomas T; Barwell J; Teixeira MR; Izatt L; Suri M; Macrae FA; Poplawski N; Chen-Shtoyerman R; Ahmed M; Musgrave H; Nicolai N; Greenhalgh L; Brewer C; Pachter N; Spigelman AD; Azzabi A; Helfand BT; Halliday D; Buys S; Ramon Y Cajal T; Donaldson A; Cooney KA; Harris M; McGrath J; Davidson R; Taylor A; Cooke P; Myhill K; Hogben M; Aaronson NK; Ardern-Jones A; Bangma CH; Castro E; Dearnaley D; Dias A; Dudderidge T; Eccles DM; Green K; Eyfjord J; Falconer A; Foster CS; Gronberg H; Hamdy FC; Johannsson O; Khoo V; Lilja H; Lindeman GJ; Lubinski J; Axcrona K; Mikropoulos C; Mitra AV; Moynihan C; Ni Raghallaigh H; Rennert G; Collier R; ; Offman J; Kote-Jarai Z; Eeles RA
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Nov; 22(11):1618-1631. PubMed ID: 34678156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Within the Göteborg Randomised Screening Trial.
Grenabo Bergdahl A; Wilderäng U; Aus G; Carlsson S; Damber JE; Frånlund M; Geterud K; Khatami A; Socratous A; Stranne J; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):566-573. PubMed ID: 26724840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Re: Prostate Cancer Screening Using a Combination of Risk-prediction, MRI, and Targeted Prostate Biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): A Prospective, Population-based, Randomised, Open-label, Non-inferiority Trial.
Raslan M; Mercader C; Lamb AD
Eur Urol; 2022 May; 81(5):543-544. PubMed ID: 35105477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Capio Prostate Cancer Center Model for Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Real-world Evidence from 2018 to 2022.
Palsdottir T; Söderbäck H; Jäderling F; Bergman M; Vigneswaran H; Grönberg H
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2024 Mar; 61():29-36. PubMed ID: 38384438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prostate cancer screening in the fit Chilean elderly: a head to head comparison of total serum PSA versus age adjusted PSA versus primary circulating prostate cells to detect prostate cancer at initial biopsy.
Murray NP; Reyes E; Orellana N; Fuentealba C; Jacob O
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(2):601-6. PubMed ID: 25684494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The SmartTarget Biopsy Trial: A Prospective, Within-person Randomised, Blinded Trial Comparing the Accuracy of Visual-registration and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Image-fusion Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification.
Hamid S; Donaldson IA; Hu Y; Rodell R; Villarini B; Bonmati E; Tranter P; Punwani S; Sidhu HS; Willis S; van der Meulen J; Hawkes D; McCartan N; Potyka I; Williams NR; Brew-Graves C; Freeman A; Moore CM; Barratt D; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol; 2019 May; 75(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 30527787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study.
Elkhoury FF; Felker ER; Kwan L; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Natarajan S; Marks LS
JAMA Surg; 2019 Sep; 154(9):811-818. PubMed ID: 31188412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
