These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34393117)

  • 21. Comparison of microleakage and shear bond strength of ribbon and twisted wire retainers bonded on human mandibular incisors with two different types of adhesives with and without primer: An in-vitro study.
    Kavousinejad S; Hosseinzadeh Nik T; Saffar Shahroudi A
    Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100693. PubMed ID: 36243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of early orthodontic force on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems.
    Abdelnaby YL; Al-Wakeel Eel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 20691363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Different lingual retainer composites and the microleakage between enamel-composite and wire-composite interfaces.
    Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 18298203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage Under Orthodontic Brackets Bonded Using a Conventional Adhesive System, Nanocomposites, and Nanoionomers: A Comparative Study.
    Rajan AV; Parameswaran R; Khan N; Balaguru S
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52537. PubMed ID: 38371005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shear bond strength of fibre-reinforced composite nets using two different adhesive systems.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Scribante A
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 20573712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets with new self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 20362914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of adhesion promoters and curing-light sources on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Machado CT; Borges BC; Araujo GJ; dos Santos AJ; Dametto FR; Pinheiro FH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):747-52. PubMed ID: 23649057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer.
    Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Zárate-Díaz C; Kusakabe S; Yamamoto K
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 20575206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Micro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives.
    Öztürk F; Ersöz M; Öztürk SA; Hatunoğlu E; Malkoç S
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25855655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Rezvani G; Rahimi M
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):501-4. PubMed ID: 22353410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with hybrid glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
    Vorhies AB; Donly KJ; Staley RN; Wefel JS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Dec; 114(6):668-74. PubMed ID: 9844206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo.
    Chatzistavrou E; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):458.e1-8; discussion 458-9. PubMed ID: 20362902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage evaluation of core buildup composite resins with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems.
    Moosavi H; Moazzami SM; Loh S; Salari S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):009-16. PubMed ID: 20228982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.