These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34393117)

  • 41. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems.
    Alkis H; Turkkahraman H; Adanir N
    Eur J Dent; 2015; 9(1):117-121. PubMed ID: 25713494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser.
    Tudehzaeim MH; Yassaei S; Taherimoghadam S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Feb; 12(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 26056521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microleakage under ceramic flash-free orthodontic brackets after thermal cycling.
    Kim J; Kanavakis G; Finkelman MD; Lee M
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Nov; 86(6):905-908. PubMed ID: 27182779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Effect of bonding materials and methods on microleakage around the edge of stainless-steel brackets: an in vitro study].
    Li ZM; Chen SH; Liu XQ; Chen J; Li NY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 16400498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Enamel surface after debracketing of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable orthodontic composite. A comparison with a traditional orthodontic composite resin.
    Tecco S; Tetè S; D'Attilio M; Festa F
    Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):81-94. PubMed ID: 18427376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study.
    Tecco S; Traini T; Caputi S; Festa F; de Luca V; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):672-7. PubMed ID: 16097240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Damon P; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jul; 114(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 9674685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems.
    Bishara SE; Gordan VV; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9878954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets Part 1: Wetting with water.
    Cacciafesta V; Bosch C; Melsen B
    Clin Orthod Res; 1998 Aug; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9918643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Are the flowable composites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Uysal T; Sari Z; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):697-702. PubMed ID: 15529507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of five different orthodontic bonding agents polymerized using halogen and light-emitting diode curing lights: an in vitro investigation.
    Banerjee S; Banerjee R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):731-2. PubMed ID: 22406726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Park SB; Son WS; Ko CC; García-Godoy F; Park MG; Kim HI; Kwon YH
    Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 20019425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of bovine and human teeth exposed to thermocycling for microleakage under bonded metal brackets.
    Canbek K; Karbach M; Gottschalk F; Erbe C; Wehrbein H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2013 Mar; 74(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 23463300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of 6 self-etching primers on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Ohashi S; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):424.e1-7; discussion 424-5. PubMed ID: 19361722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing.
    Chin MY; Sandham A; Rumachik EN; Ruben JL; Huysmans MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 19815157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.