These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34393130)

  • 21. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
    Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
    Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model.
    Dederichs M; Fahmy MD; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):784-789. PubMed ID: 31206914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status.
    Bennani V; Schwass D; Chandler N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 139(10):1354-63. PubMed ID: 18832271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.
    Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
    Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
    Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quick, painless, and atraumatic gingival retraction: An overview of advanced materials.
    Rajambigai MA; Raja SR; Soundar SI; Kandasamy M
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2016 Oct; 8(Suppl 1):S5-S7. PubMed ID: 27829736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Gingival retraction methods. A literature review].
    Tosches NA; Salvi GE
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 19306598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review].
    Hong LG; Guo LP; Xue LL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Aug; 22(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 24100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
    Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
    Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gingival Retraction Methods for Fabrication of Fixed Partial Denture: Literature Review.
    S S; Ma VS; Mi VS; F HG; M H
    J Dent Biomater; 2016 Jun; 3(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 28959744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Addition Silicone Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: Clinical Standpoints.
    Madanshetty P; Guttal SS; Meshramkar R; Newaskar PS; Anehosur GV
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e44014. PubMed ID: 37746395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effectiveness of laser-assisted gingival troughing and conventional gingival displacement methods in fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review.
    Tamim H; Usumez A; Franzen R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38212156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.