These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34393453)

  • 1. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Contact and Non-contact Pachymetry Devices.
    Mayali H; Altinisik M; Diri I; Ilker S; Kurt E; Kayikcioglu O
    J Curr Glaucoma Pract; 2021; 15(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 34393453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.
    Soulantzou K; Plakitsi A; Chalkiadaki E; Anastasopoulou M; Karmiris E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):363-370. PubMed ID: 35864284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry and 2 new devices, Tonoref III and RS-3000.
    Desmond T; Arthur P; Watt K
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 39(4):917-923. PubMed ID: 29564805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability and agreement of CCT measurement in myopia using entacam and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Luo YH; Zhong Q; Ouyang PB; Guo XJ; Duan XC
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 22773982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes.
    Al-Ageel S; Al-Muammar AM
    Saudi J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 23(3-4):181-7. PubMed ID: 23960858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Tai LY; Khaw KW; Ng CM; Subrayan V
    Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 23095499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of central corneal thickness using Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes.
    Gharieb HM; Ashour DM; Saleh MI; Othman IS
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 32221762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan.
    Khaja WA; Grover S; Kelmenson AT; Ferguson LR; Sambhav K; Chalam KV
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1065-70. PubMed ID: 26109840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurements with a new handheld non-contact pachymeter.
    Lawrenson JG; Gill S; Masuid I; Rashid F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Nov; 43(6):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 37382205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of central corneal thickness measurements using Topcon TRK-1P, Zeiss Visante AS-OCT and DGH Pachmate 55 handheld ultrasonic pachymeter.
    Wells M; Wu N; Kokkinakis J; Sutton G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jul; 96(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 23336739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes.
    Yu A; Zhao W; Savini G; Huang Z; Bao F; Lu W; Wang Q; Huang J
    J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():767012. PubMed ID: 26697213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Central corneal thickness measurements in phakic, pseudophakic, and aphakic children with ultrasound pachymetry and different non-contact devices.
    Farvardin M; Shamsi A; Norouzpour A; Jalalpour MH
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 34370171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry.
    Al-Mezaine HS; Al-Amro SA; Kangave D; Sadaawy A; Wehaib TA; Al-Obeidan S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 28(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 17898935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between Tonopachy and other tonometric and pachymetric devices.
    Lee YG; Kim JH; Kim NR; Kim CY; Lee ES
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 88(7):843-9. PubMed ID: 21499167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained by Pentacam with those obtained by IOLMaster 700, Cirrus anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Tomey specular microscopy in normal healthy eyes.
    Kumar KK; Prakash AA; Neeraja TG; Adappa KT; Prabha TSC; Gangasagara SB
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 69(7):1713-1717. PubMed ID: 34146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements by Pentacam and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Myopic Patients.
    Emerah S; ELZakzouk E; Farag M
    Electron Physician; 2016 Dec; 8(12):3441-3444. PubMed ID: 28163862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.
    Jahadi Hosseini HR; Katbab A; Khalili MR; Abtahi MB
    Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1091-5. PubMed ID: 20628301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
    González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Different Imaging Devices: Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Tono-Pachymetry.
    Ceylan A; Onal I; Mergen B; Yildirim Y
    Beyoglu Eye J; 2022; 7(1):54-58. PubMed ID: 35265803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
    Şimşek C; Kaya C; Karalezli A
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 52(5):318-323. PubMed ID: 36317802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.