252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3439423)
1. Relation between warning stimuli and contingent negative variation in man.
Hamon JF; Seri B
Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1987 Dec; 29(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 3439423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Information processing to rare and frequent warning stimuli in a C.N.V. paradigm.
Hamon JF
Acta Physiol Hung; 1990; 76(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 2100098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of instructions in multi-discrimination experiments on event related potentials.
Hamon JF; Gauthier P; Gottesmann C
Physiol Bohemoslov; 1989; 38(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 2528769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appearance of two-level CNV and extrication wave and the explanation of psychological factors of CNV.
Wei JH; Zheng LX
Int J Neurosci; 1987 Feb; 32(3-4):747-56. PubMed ID: 3596920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The extent of active processing of a long-duration stimulus modulates the scalp-recorded sustained potential.
Campbell K; Herzig A; Jashmidi P
Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):170-5. PubMed ID: 18752881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Basis and clinical application of the "contingent negative variation" in "evoked response audiometry" (author's transl)].
Brix R
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1975 Jan; 87(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 1130075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contingent negative variation elicited before jaw and tongue movements.
Yoshida K; Iizuka T
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 32(12):871-9. PubMed ID: 16297033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The anticipatory potential (contingent negative variation) as an indicator of neuronal information processing in relation to changes in slow potentials in the EEG].
Korunka C; Bauer H; Wolek A; Leodolter M
Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1990; 37(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 2333723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of response type (motor output versus mental counting) on the intracerebral distribution of the slow cortical potentials in an externally cued (CNV) paradigm.
Bares M; Nestrasil I; Rektor I
Brain Res Bull; 2007 Jan; 71(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 17208661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of preparatory activity indexed by the contingent negative variation in children.
Flores AB; Digiacomo MR; Meneres S; Trigo E; Gómez CM
Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 19500893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Specific task anticipation versus unspecific orienting reaction during early contingent negative variation.
Bender S; Resch F; Weisbrod M; Oelkers-Ax R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Aug; 115(8):1836-45. PubMed ID: 15261862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Slow brain potentials associated with motor preparation and stimulus anticipation.
Philipova D; Popivanov D; Georgieva S; Tchukanova R
Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 2001; 26(1-2):107-10. PubMed ID: 11693387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Contingent negative variation in patients with severe closed head injury--its diagnostic value as a quantitative evaluating method for certain aspect of posttraumatic syndrome (author's transl)].
Katayama Y; Tsubokawa T; Yamamoto T; Kitamura M; Nishimoto H; Moriyasu N
No Shinkei Geka; 1979 Nov; 7(11):1075-82. PubMed ID: 522963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task.
Brown CR; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of neck flexion on contingent negative variation and anticipatory postural control during arm movement while standing.
Fujiwara K; Tomita H; Maeda K; Kunita K
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Feb; 19(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 17884580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain activity during interval timing depends on sensory structure.
Pfeuty M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1204():112-7. PubMed ID: 18336798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frontal lobe involvement in the processing of meaningful auditory stimuli develops during childhood and adolescence.
Bender S; Oelkers-Ax R; Resch F; Weisbrod M
Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):759-73. PubMed ID: 16934494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
