145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34399186)
1. Suitability of a dual COI marker for marine zooplankton DNA metabarcoding.
Schroeder A; Pallavicini A; Edomi P; Pansera M; Camatti E
Mar Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 170():105444. PubMed ID: 34399186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents.
Leray M; Yang JY; Meyer CP; Mills SC; Agudelo N; Ranwez V; Boehm JT; Machida RJ
Front Zool; 2013; 10():34. PubMed ID: 23767809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis - Assessment of zooplankton biodiversity in transitional waters.
Schroeder A; Stanković D; Pallavicini A; Gionechetti F; Pansera M; Camatti E
Mar Environ Res; 2020 Sep; 160():104946. PubMed ID: 32907716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental validation of taxon-specific mini-barcode primers for metabarcoding of zooplankton.
Govender A; Singh S; Groeneveld J; Pillay S; Willows-Munro S
Ecol Appl; 2022 Jan; 32(1):e02469. PubMed ID: 34626511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of marker choice and thermal cycling protocol on zooplankton DNA metabarcoding studies.
Clarke LJ; Beard JM; Swadling KM; Deagle BE
Ecol Evol; 2017 Feb; 7(3):873-883. PubMed ID: 28168024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Zooplankton Community Profiling in a Eutrophic Freshwater Ecosystem-Lake Tai Basin by DNA Metabarcoding.
Yang J; Zhang X; Xie Y; Song C; Zhang Y; Yu H; Burton GA
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1773. PubMed ID: 28496194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indigenous species barcode database improves the identification of zooplankton.
Yang J; Zhang X; Zhang W; Sun J; Xie Y; Zhang Y; Burton GA; Yu H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185697. PubMed ID: 28977035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder.
Suter L; Polanowski AM; Clarke LJ; Kitchener JA; Deagle BE
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3140-3157. PubMed ID: 32767849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-marker metabarcoding approach to study mesozooplankton at basin scale.
Stefanni S; Stanković D; Borme D; de Olazabal A; Juretić T; Pallavicini A; Tirelli V
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12085. PubMed ID: 30108256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities.
Zhang GK; Chain FJJ; Abbott CL; Cristescu ME
Evol Appl; 2018 Dec; 11(10):1901-1914. PubMed ID: 30459837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A circumpolar study of surface zooplankton biodiversity of the Southern Ocean based on eDNA metabarcoding.
Zhang Z; Bao Y; Fang X; Ruan Y; Rong Y; Yang G
Environ Res; 2024 Aug; 255():119183. PubMed ID: 38768883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing the potential of a ribosomal 16S marker for DNA metabarcoding of insects.
Elbrecht V; Taberlet P; Dejean T; Valentini A; Usseglio-Polatera P; Beisel JN; Coissac E; Boyer F; Leese F
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1966. PubMed ID: 27114891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-locus DNA metabarcoding of zooplankton communities and scat reveal trophic interactions of a generalist predator.
Carroll EL; Gallego R; Sewell MA; Zeldis J; Ranjard L; Ross HA; Tooman LK; O'Rorke R; Newcomb RD; Constantine R
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):281. PubMed ID: 30670720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of markers for the monitoring of freshwater benthic biodiversity through DNA metabarcoding.
Ficetola GF; Boyer F; Valentini A; Bonin A; Meyer A; Dejean T; Gaboriaud C; Usseglio-Polatera P; Taberlet P
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3189-3202. PubMed ID: 32920861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.
Kumar G; Reaume AM; Farrell E; Gaither MR
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0266720. PubMed ID: 35714082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes.
Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the biodiversity of terrestrial invertebrates on a forested island using DNA barcodes and metabarcoding data.
Dopheide A; Tooman LK; Grosser S; Agabiti B; Rhode B; Xie D; Stevens MI; Nelson N; Buckley TR; Drummond AJ; Newcomb RD
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01877. PubMed ID: 30811075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why the COI barcode should be the community DNA metabarcode for the metazoa.
Andújar C; Arribas P; Yu DW; Vogler AP; Emerson BC
Mol Ecol; 2018 Oct; 27(20):3968-3975. PubMed ID: 30129071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. eDNA metabarcoding of small plankton samples to detect fish larvae and their preys from Atlantic and Pacific waters.
Garcia-Vazquez E; Georges O; Fernandez S; Ardura A
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):7224. PubMed ID: 33790382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
