These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34399228)
21. An innovative in-situ DRAINage system for advanced groundwater reactive TREATment (in-DRAIN-TREAT). Bortone I; Santonastaso G; Erto A; Chianese S; Di Nardo A; Musmarra D Chemosphere; 2021 May; 270():129412. PubMed ID: 33401077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Column test-based optimization of the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technique for remediating groundwater contaminated by landfill leachates. Zhou D; Li Y; Zhang Y; Zhang C; Li X; Chen Z; Huang J; Li X; Flores G; Kamon M J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Nov; 168():1-16. PubMed ID: 25244420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Comprehensive Review for Groundwater Contamination and Remediation: Occurrence, Migration and Adsorption Modelling. Al-Hashimi O; Hashim K; Loffill E; Marolt Čebašek T; Nakouti I; Faisal AAH; Al-Ansari N Molecules; 2021 Sep; 26(19):. PubMed ID: 34641456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Heavy metal removal capacity of individual components of permeable reactive concrete. Holmes RR; Hart ML; Kevern JT J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Jan; 196():52-61. PubMed ID: 27993468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A passive sink-zeolite permeable reactive barrier to control NH Zhan L; Zhao L; Wu L; You Y; Bate B Chemosphere; 2023 Sep; 334():138965. PubMed ID: 37236276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transport of sulfacetamide and levofloxacin in granular porous media under various conditions: Experimental observations and model simulations. Dong S; Gao B; Sun Y; Shi X; Xu H; Wu J; Wu J Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 573():1630-1637. PubMed ID: 27692941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A sustainable ferromanganese biochar adsorbent for effective levofloxacin removal from aqueous medium. Xiang Y; Xu Z; Zhou Y; Wei Y; Long X; He Y; Zhi D; Yang J; Luo L Chemosphere; 2019 Dec; 237():124464. PubMed ID: 31394454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laboratory column study for evaluating a multimedia permeable reactive barrier for the remediation of ammonium contaminated groundwater. Kong X; Bi E; Liu F; Huang G; Ma J Environ Technol; 2015; 36(9-12):1433-40. PubMed ID: 25428576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transport characteristics of surface-modified nanoscale zero-valent iron in porous media. Kanel SR; Choi H Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(1-2):157-62. PubMed ID: 17305135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Field-scale demonstration of in situ immobilization of heavy metals by injecting iron oxide nanoparticle adsorption barriers in groundwater. Mohammadian S; Krok B; Fritzsche A; Bianco C; Tosco T; Cagigal E; Mata B; Gonzalez V; Diez-Ortiz M; Ramos V; Montalvo D; Smolders E; Sethi R; Meckenstock RU J Contam Hydrol; 2021 Feb; 237():103741. PubMed ID: 33341658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In situ remediation of Cr(VI) contaminated groundwater by ZVI-PRB and the corresponding indigenous microbial community responses: a field-scale study. Wang Q; Song X; Wei C; Jin P; Chen X; Tang Z; Li K; Ding X; Fu H Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 805():150260. PubMed ID: 34537698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Porous geopolymer with controllable interconnected pores-a viable permeable reactive barrier filler for lead pollutant removal. Zhang X; Zhang X; Li X; Liu Y; Yu H; Ma M Chemosphere; 2022 Nov; 307(Pt 4):136128. PubMed ID: 35995199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fruit waste-derived cellulose and graphene-based aerogels: Plausible adsorption pathways for fast and efficient removal of organic dyes. Joshi P; Sharma OP; Ganguly SK; Srivastava M; Khatri OP J Colloid Interface Sci; 2022 Feb; 608(Pt 3):2870-2883. PubMed ID: 34802756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Simultaneous removal of Pb and MTBE by mixed zeolites in fixed-bed column tests. Zhang Y; Wang F; Cao B; Yin H; Al-Tabbaa A J Environ Sci (China); 2022 Dec; 122():41-49. PubMed ID: 35717089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Utilizing machine learning for reactive material selection and width design in permeable reactive barrier (PRB). Ren Y; Cui M; Zhou Y; Sun S; Guo F; Ma J; Han Z; Park J; Son Y; Khim J Water Res; 2024 Mar; 251():121097. PubMed ID: 38218071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Denitrification using permeable reactive barriers with organic substrate or zero-valent iron fillers: controlling mechanisms, challenges, and future perspectives. Amoako-Nimako GK; Yang X; Chen F Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(17):21045-21064. PubMed ID: 33728604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Removal of levofloxacin from aqueous solution using rice-husk and wood-chip biochars. Yi S; Gao B; Sun Y; Wu J; Shi X; Wu B; Hu X Chemosphere; 2016 May; 150():694-701. PubMed ID: 26796588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Should the term 'metallic iron' appear in the title of a research paper? Noubactep C Chemosphere; 2022 Jan; 287(Pt 4):132314. PubMed ID: 34600924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating a novel permeable reactive bio-barrier to remediate PAH-contaminated groundwater. Liu C; Chen X; Mack EE; Wang S; Du W; Yin Y; Banwart SA; Guo H J Hazard Mater; 2019 Apr; 368():444-451. PubMed ID: 30708346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance expectation of coal waste in permeable reactive barrier for removal of cadmium considering contamination level and pore water velocity. Kim JH; Kwak E; Lee S Chemosphere; 2023 Dec; 345():140387. PubMed ID: 37832884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]