164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34399792)
1. Reliability and reproducibility of measurements in para-sagittal planes on sub-axial cervical vertebral bodies: a morphometric study of endplates in three-dimensional models.
Wang L; Luo HT; Lu W; Cai XB; Yu C; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 16(1):503. PubMed ID: 34399792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of the reproducibility and reliability of sagittal vertebral inclination measurements from MR images of the spine.
Vrtovec T; Pernuš F; Likar B
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Oct; 38(7):620-7. PubMed ID: 24881499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and Reliability of Computer-aided Anatomical Measurements for Vertebral Body and Disc Based on Computed Tomography Scans.
Yao J; Dong B; Sun J; Liu JT; Liu F; Li XW; Yuan PW; Zhang JB
Orthop Surg; 2020 Aug; 12(4):1182-1189. PubMed ID: 32618427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A morphometric study of the middle and lower cervical vertebral endplates and their components.
Feng H; Fang XY; Huang DG; Yu CC; Li HK; Zhao SC; Ge CY; Bai RH; Hao DJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Mar; 96(10):e6296. PubMed ID: 28272256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.
Birchall D; Hughes DG; Hindle J; Robinson L; Williamson JB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(20):2403-7. PubMed ID: 9355222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenges in measuring angles between craniofacial structures.
Yatabe M; Gomes L; Ruellas AC; Lopinto J; Macron L; Paniagua B; Budin F; Prieto JC; Ioshida M; Cevidanes L
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 27():e20180380. PubMed ID: 31166412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D landmarks of Craniofacial Imaging and subsequent considerations on superimpositions in orthodontics-The Aarhus perspective.
Cattaneo PM; Yung AKC; Holm A; Mashaly OM; Cornelis MA
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1():21-29. PubMed ID: 31074143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphometry evaluations of cervical osseous endplates based on three dimensional reconstructions.
Feng H; Li H; Ba Z; Chen Z; Li X; Wu D
Int Orthop; 2019 Jun; 43(6):1521-1528. PubMed ID: 30091068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ideal starting point and trajectory for C2 pedicle screw placement: a 3D computed tomography analysis using perioperative measurements.
Chin KR; Mills MV; Seale J; Cumming V
Spine J; 2014 Apr; 14(4):615-8. PubMed ID: 24200408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the axial vertebral rotation measurements of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the center of lamina method on ultrasound images: in vitro and in vivo study.
Chen W; Le LH; Lou EH
Eur Spine J; 2016 Oct; 25(10):3265-3273. PubMed ID: 26951170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional measurement of wedged scoliotic vertebrae and intervertebral disks.
Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Petit Y; Parent F; de Guise JA; Labelle H
Eur Spine J; 1998; 7(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9548361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of MRI grading for cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on axial and oblique sagittal images: Concordance and reliability study.
Kim W; Ahn KS; Kang CH; Kang WY; Yang KS
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():165-169. PubMed ID: 28334616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of measures of cervical sagittal rotation.
Jiang SD; Chen JW; Yang YH; Chen XD; Jiang LS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():332. PubMed ID: 25281011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion: reliability of a computer assisted magnetic tracking device compared to inclinometer.
Gelalis ID; DeFrate LE; Stafilas KS; Pakos EE; Kang JD; Gilbertson LG
Eur Spine J; 2009 Feb; 18(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19096884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of pre-operative diffusion tensor imaging parameter measurements of the cervical spine in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Lee E; Lee JW; Bae YJ; Kim HJ; Kang Y; Ahn JM
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17410. PubMed ID: 33060848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of cephalograms derived of cone beam computed tomography versus lateral cephalograms to estimate cervical vertebrae maturity in a Peruvian population: A retrospective study.
Echevarría-Sánchez G; Arriola-Guillén LE; Malpartida-Carrillo V; Tinedo-López PL; Palti-Menendez R; Guerrero ME
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 32014428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects.
Jordan K; Dziedzic K; Jones PW; Ong BN; Dawes PT
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2000 Apr; 39(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 10817770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of implant positioning evaluation on a CT-based three-dimensional postoperative matching system for total knee arthroplasty.
Watanabe S; Akagi R; Shiko Y; Ono Y; Kawasaki Y; Ohdera T; Ohtori S; Sasho T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):363. PubMed ID: 33865360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
