These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34399792)

  • 21. [In vivo measurement of three-dimensional motion of the upper cervical spine using CT three-dimensional reconstruction].
    Zhai X; Kang J; Chen X; Dong J; Qiu XW; Ding XA; Liu J; He XJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Jul; 32(7):658-665. PubMed ID: 31382726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Manual and computerized measurement of coronal vertebral inclination on MRI images: a pilot study.
    Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernuš F
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Aug; 68(8):807-14. PubMed ID: 23615034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reproducibility of radiographic measurements for subaxial cervical spine trauma.
    Bono CM; Schoenfeld A; Rampersaud R; Levi A; Grauer J; Arnold P; Fehlings M; Dvorak M; Vaccaro AR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21587104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is MRI an adequate replacement for CT scans in the three-dimensional assessment of acetabular morphology?
    Goronzy J; Blum S; Hartmann A; Plodeck V; Franken L; Günther KP; Thielemann F
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):726-734. PubMed ID: 30149750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transrectal three-dimensional fetal volumetry and crown-rump length measurement during early gestation in mares: Intra- and inter-observer reliability and agreement.
    Becsek A; Tzanidakis N; Blanco M; Bollwein H
    Theriogenology; 2019 Mar; 126():266-271. PubMed ID: 30590249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of Allen Ferguson classification versus subaxial injury classification and severity scale for subaxial cervical spine injuries: a psychometrics study.
    Kanagaraju V; Yelamarthy PKK; Chhabra HS; Shetty AP; Nanda A; Sangondimath GM; Dutta Das K; Bansal ML; Mohapatra B; Patel N; Abel R; Tuli S; Barros T; Tandon V
    Spinal Cord; 2019 Jan; 57(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 30089891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of determining radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis using a manual and a computer-assisted methods.
    Dimar JR; Carreon LY; Labelle H; Djurasovic M; Weidenbaum M; Brown C; Roussouly P
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Oct; 17(10):1373-9. PubMed ID: 18726124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the novel vertebral bone quality score.
    Mierke A; Ramos O; Macneille R; Chung JH; Wycliffe N; Cheng W; Danisa OA
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Apr; 31(4):843-850. PubMed ID: 34984535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Good Inter- and Intra-Observer Reliability for Assessment of Radiographic Femoral and Tibial Frontal and Sagittal Planes Joints Angles in Normal Cats.
    Palumbo Piccionello A; Salvaggio A; Volta A; Emiliozzi F; Botto R; Dini F; Petazzoni M
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Sep; 33(5):308-315. PubMed ID: 32408358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Sagittal Thoracic Modifier Component of the Lenke Classification System in Moderate and Severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Reliability and Reproducibility of Measurements Among 5 Observers.
    El-Fiky T; Elsagheer H; Darwish M; Essmat H; Kamal R; Hasan A; Shoukry F; Allam Y
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Jul; 32(6):E266-E271. PubMed ID: 30807366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repeatability and intra- and inter-observer agreement of cervical vertebral sagittal diameter ratios in horses with neurological disease.
    Hughes KJ; Laidlaw EH; Reed SM; Keen J; Abbott JB; Trevail T; Hammond G; Parkin TD; Love S
    J Vet Intern Med; 2014; 28(6):1860-70. PubMed ID: 25410955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vertebral morphometry: a comparison of long-term precision of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography in normal and osteoporotic subjects.
    Rea JA; Chen MB; Li J; Marsh E; Fan B; Blake GM; Steiger P; Smith IG; Genant HK; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 11303717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Manual and computerized measurement of sagittal vertebral inclination in computed tomography images.
    Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernuš F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E875-81. PubMed ID: 21289562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction.
    Jóźwiak M; Rychlik M; Musielak B; Chen BP; Idzior M; Grzegorzewski A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():42. PubMed ID: 25887277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Both scanning plane and observer affect measurements of scaphoid deformity.
    Ring D; Patterson JD; Levitz S; Wang C; Jupiter JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 16039360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images.
    Toma AM; Zhurov A; Playle R; Ong E; Richmond S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19154273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes.
    Ruellas AC; Tonello C; Gomes LR; Yatabe MS; Macron L; Lopinto J; Goncalves JR; Garib Carreira DG; Alonso N; Souki BQ; Coqueiro Rda S; Cevidanes LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 May; 149(5):645-56. PubMed ID: 27131246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An objective spinal motion imaging assessment (OSMIA): reliability, accuracy and exposure data.
    Breen AC; Muggleton JM; Mellor FE
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Jan; 7():1. PubMed ID: 16393336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical assessment of breast symmetry and aesthetic outcome: can 3D imaging be the gold standard?
    Bai L; Lundström O; Johansson H; Meybodi F; Arver B; Sandelin K; Wickman M; Brandberg Y
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2023; 57(1-6):145-152. PubMed ID: 35034560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Geometry of inferior endplates of the cervical spine.
    Lou J; Liu H; Rong X; Li H; Wang B; Gong Q
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 142():132-136. PubMed ID: 26852320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.