These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34399920)

  • 1. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying the Accumulator model to predict driver's reaction time based on looming in approaching and braking conditions.
    Durrani U; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2023 Sep; 86():298-310. PubMed ID: 37718057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure.
    Zhao P; Lee C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():149-158. PubMed ID: 29407662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study on driver's active emergency response in dangerous traffic scenes based on driving simulator.
    Ma S; Xu S; Song J; Wang K; Qin H; Wang R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 38019530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical investigation after a motorcoach strikes the rear of a tractor semitrailer parked on the highway; 13 fatal.
    McKay MP; Poland K; Barth TH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S162-S164. PubMed ID: 30841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.
    Chen Y; Fu R; Xu Q; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32092914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the importance of driver models for the development and assessment of active safety: A new collision warning system to make overtaking cyclists safer.
    Kovaceva J; Bärgman J; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106513. PubMed ID: 34936932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive forward collision warning system for hazmat truck drivers: Considering differential driving behavior and risk levels.
    Shao Y; Shi X; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Xu Y; Chen W; Ye Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107221. PubMed ID: 37473523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of driver's age and side of impact on crash severity along urban freeways: a mixed logit approach.
    Haleem K; Gan A
    J Safety Res; 2013 Sep; 46():67-76. PubMed ID: 23932687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increase in rear-end collision risk by acute stress-induced fatigue in on-road truck driving.
    Minusa S; Mizuno K; Ojiro D; Tanaka T; Kuriyama H; Yamano E; Kuratsune H; Watanabe Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258892. PubMed ID: 34673839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crash probability estimation via quantifying driver hazard perception.
    Li Y; Zheng Y; Wang J; Kodaka K; Li K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28595973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sleep-deprived car-following: Indicators of rear-end crash potential.
    Mahajan K; Velaga NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106123. PubMed ID: 33862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.