624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34399920)
1. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
Shah D; Lee C
J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applying the Accumulator model to predict driver's reaction time based on looming in approaching and braking conditions.
Durrani U; Lee C
J Safety Res; 2023 Sep; 86():298-310. PubMed ID: 37718057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure.
Zhao P; Lee C
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():149-158. PubMed ID: 29407662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
Gao J; Davis GA
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study on driver's active emergency response in dangerous traffic scenes based on driving simulator.
Ma S; Xu S; Song J; Wang K; Qin H; Wang R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 38019530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical investigation after a motorcoach strikes the rear of a tractor semitrailer parked on the highway; 13 fatal.
McKay MP; Poland K; Barth TH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S162-S164. PubMed ID: 30841801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.
Chen Y; Fu R; Xu Q; Yuan W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32092914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the importance of driver models for the development and assessment of active safety: A new collision warning system to make overtaking cyclists safer.
Kovaceva J; Bärgman J; Dozza M
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106513. PubMed ID: 34936932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive forward collision warning system for hazmat truck drivers: Considering differential driving behavior and risk levels.
Shao Y; Shi X; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Xu Y; Chen W; Ye Z
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107221. PubMed ID: 37473523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of driver's age and side of impact on crash severity along urban freeways: a mixed logit approach.
Haleem K; Gan A
J Safety Res; 2013 Sep; 46():67-76. PubMed ID: 23932687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increase in rear-end collision risk by acute stress-induced fatigue in on-road truck driving.
Minusa S; Mizuno K; Ojiro D; Tanaka T; Kuriyama H; Yamano E; Kuratsune H; Watanabe Y
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258892. PubMed ID: 34673839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Crash probability estimation via quantifying driver hazard perception.
Li Y; Zheng Y; Wang J; Kodaka K; Li K
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28595973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sleep-deprived car-following: Indicators of rear-end crash potential.
Mahajan K; Velaga NR
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106123. PubMed ID: 33862404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
