These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3440187)
61. [Correlativity between projected visual chart vision and contrast vision]. Liu DM; Zhou S; Xia WT; Chen JM; Peng SY Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 29(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 23930500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Contrast sensitivity basics and a critique of currently available tests. Richman J; Spaeth GL; Wirostko B J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1100-6. PubMed ID: 23706926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Predicting visual resolution from detection thresholds. Adams AJ; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Brown B; Jampolsky A Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Jun; 61(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 6742097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. [Assessment of vision using a computer]. Peregrin J; Klazar E; Peregrin J; Hartmann M; Svĕrák J Cesk Oftalmol; 1991 Feb; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 1913882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Contrast sensitivity function as a screening test: a critique. Legge GE; Rubin GS Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Apr; 63(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 3706481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Conversion between E-shape and C-shape optotypes]. Bao TZ Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1986 May; 22(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 3096650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. A new set of variable-contrast visual acuity charts. Wang GJ; Pomerantzeff O Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jan; 68(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 2023714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Perception of blur in optometric tests. Kurtev A Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1979 Apr; 56(4):277-8. PubMed ID: 517630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. [Objective study of visual acuity in expert practice]. Pinchuk GD Vestn Oftalmol; 1977; (2):45-6. PubMed ID: 860366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. New developments in visual acuity charts. Casellato L Ophthalmologica; 1994; 208(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 8183532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [Exploration of spatial vision in monophthalmia and amblyopia, using an apparatus with 3 rods]. Săbădeanu V; Kovacs M; Chiriţă E Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Oftalmol; 1978; 22(3):171-3. PubMed ID: 725145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. [Comparative study of the results on the Wirt, stereoscope and T.N.O]. Chevaleraud JP; Brenneissen C; Santucci GF Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1975; 75(7-8):757-60. PubMed ID: 1222479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Measuring contrast sensitivity using the M&S Smart System II versus the Pelli-Robson chart. Chandrakumar M; Colpa L; Reginald YA; Goltz HC; Wong AM Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):2160-1.e1. PubMed ID: 24090954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited. Heinrich SP; Krüger K; Bach M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 248(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 20076965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. New developments in visual acuity charts. Moseley MJ Ophthalmologica; 1995; 209(1):52. PubMed ID: 7715930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. The Portable Eye Examination Kit: Mobile phones can screen for eye disease in low-resource settings. Ettore Giardini M IEEE Pulse; 2015; 6(6):15-7. PubMed ID: 26583885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Adult levels of meridional anisotropy and contrast threshold in 5-year olds. Beazley LD; O'Connor WM; Illingworth DJ Vision Res; 1982; 22(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 7101737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [A method for determination and evaluation of dynamic visual acuity (author's transl)]. Milczyński T Klin Oczna; 1977 Jul; 47(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 886812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Modification of the Goldmann-Weekers adaptometer to a self-testing device. Lakowski R; Sutherland J; Goldthwaite D Can J Ophthalmol; 1973 Jul; 8(3):478-87. PubMed ID: 4742906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]