These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34401930)

  • 1. Response to "On the choice of methodology for evaluating dose-rate effects on radiation-related cancer risks" by Walsh et al.
    Little MP; Pawel DJ; Abalo K; Hauptmann M
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2021 Nov; 60(4):515-516. PubMed ID: 34401930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply and explanation to Little et al. "Response to: On the choice of methodology for evaluating dose‑rate effects on radiation‑related cancer risks".
    Walsh L; Shore R; Azizova TV; Rühm W
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2021 Nov; 60(4):517-518. PubMed ID: 34591166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the choice of methodology for evaluating dose-rate effects on radiation-related cancer risks.
    Walsh L; Shore R; Azizova TV; Rühm W
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2021 Aug; 60(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 34170393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between Walsh and autoregressive derived parameters of heart rate variablity spectra in normal subjects and diabetics.
    Kamal A; Al-Mijalli MH
    Neurosciences (Riyadh); 2001 Apr; 6(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 24185272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spinal cord response to altered fractionation and re-irradiation: radiobiological considerations and role of bioeffect models.
    Supe SS; Ganesh KM; Naveen T; Jacob S; Sankar BN
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2006; 2(3):105-18. PubMed ID: 17998688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis.
    Cao CF; Ma KL; Shan H; Liu TF; Zhao SQ; Wan Y; Jun-Zhang ; Wang HQ
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1238. PubMed ID: 36451138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An indirect high iodine (
    Al-Shakhrah IA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 21(7):173-180. PubMed ID: 32573916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ionising radiation and cancer risks: what have we learned from epidemiology?
    Gilbert ES
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2009 Jun; 85(6):467-82. PubMed ID: 19401906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patterns of failure following surgical resection for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    Jänne PA; Baldini EH
    Thorac Surg Clin; 2004 Nov; 14(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 15559064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comment on "Linkage analysis of a model quantitative trait in humans: Finger ridge count shows significant multivariate linkage to 5q14.1" by Medland et al., "Common Genetic Variants Influence Whorls in Fingerprint Patterns" by Ho et al. and "Hot on the Trail of Genes that Shape Our Fingerprints" by Walsh et al .
    Walton AD; Moret S; Gunn P; Barash M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():e14-e16. PubMed ID: 29941291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cancer risks and low-level radiation in U.S. shipyard workers.
    Matanoski GM; Tonascia JA; Correa-Villaseñor A; Yates KC; Fink N; Elliott E; Sanders B; Lantry D
    J Radiat Res; 2008 Jan; 49(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 17690532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards a new dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF)? Some comments.
    Chadwick KH
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Jun; 37(2):422-433. PubMed ID: 28488593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.
    Colditz GA
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Worker doses and potential health effects resulting from the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in 2011.
    Etherington G; Zhang W; Harrison J; Walsh L
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2014 Nov; 90(11):1088-94. PubMed ID: 25029672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk?
    Nguyen PK; Wu JC
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2011 Feb; 9(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 21453214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low dose radiation risk: comment on the opinion article 'Interpretation of risk for low dose radiation exposures: inconsistences, philosophical problems and fallacies' by Walsh (2020).
    Chadwick KH
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Nov; 40(4):. PubMed ID: 33226010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical reliability of four oral fluid point-of-collection testing devices for drug detection in drivers.
    Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Rabelo-da-Ponte FD; Silvestrin R; Ornell R; Sousa T; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110434. PubMed ID: 32758788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Engaging, not excluding: a response to Walsh et al.
    Pellicano E; Ne'eman A; Stears M
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 12(12):769; author reply 769. PubMed ID: 22095067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A framework for estimating radiation-related cancer risks in Japan from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident.
    Walsh L; Zhang W; Shore RE; Auvinen A; Laurier D; Wakeford R; Jacob P; Gent N; Anspaugh LR; Schüz J; Kesminiene A; van Deventer E; Tritscher A; del Rosarion Pérez M
    Radiat Res; 2014 Nov; 182(5):556-72. PubMed ID: 25251702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.