597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34402588)
1. Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach.
Choi CH; Cao K; Malaver D; Kincaid EH; Lata A; Kon N; Belford PM; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 34402588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-Year Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Using New-Generation Transcatheter Devices Compared With Redo-SAVR.
Nagasaka T; Koren O; Patel V; Naami R; Naami E; Shechter A; Kohan S; Allison Z; Lerner A; Cheng DE; Chakravarty T; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Ishii H; Nakamura M; Makkar RR
Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():380-389. PubMed ID: 37778227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses.
Duncan A; Moat N; Simonato M; de Weger A; Kempfert J; Eggebrecht H; Walton A; Hellig F; Kornowski R; Spargias K; Mendiz O; Makkar R; Guerrero M; Rihal C; George I; Don C; Iadanza A; Bapat V; Welsh R; Wijeysundera HC; Wood D; Sathananthan J; Danenberg H; Maisano F; Garcia S; Gafoor S; Nombela-Franco L; Cobiella J; Dvir D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(13):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 31202944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed A; Levy KH
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Cavalcanti LRP; Doulamis IP; Weixler V; Kampaktsis PN; Gallo M; Laforgia PL; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 33478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcatheter ViV Versus Redo Surgical AVR for the Management of Failed Biological Prosthesis: Early and Late Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.
Tam DY; Dharma C; Rocha RV; Ouzounian M; Wijeysundera HC; Austin PC; Chikwe J; Gaudino M; Fremes SE
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 13(6):765-774. PubMed ID: 31954671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement.
Deharo P; Bisson A; Herbert J; Lacour T; Etienne CS; Porto A; Theron A; Collart F; Bourguignon T; Cuisset T; Fauchier L
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 76(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 32731926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic Regurgitation, Time to Aortic Valve Reintervention, and Mortality in Degenerated Trifecta Versus Non-Trifecta Bioprosthesis.
Abbas AE; Madanat L; Khalili H; Mando R; Kheyrbek M; Chandra R; Niroula S; Hanson I; Dixon S; Renard B; Bloomingdale R; Cami E; Pridham B; Altshuler J; Kindzelski B; Fazzalari F; Shannon F; Vivacqua A
Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 220():49-55. PubMed ID: 38580038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arjomandi Rad A; Naruka V; Vardanyan R; Salmasi MY; Tasoudis PT; Kendall S; Casula R; Athanasiou T
J Card Surg; 2022 Nov; 37(11):3743-3753. PubMed ID: 36040611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Surgery for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Dysfunction.
Neupane S; Singh H; Lämmer J; Othman H; Yamasaki H; Rosman HS; Bossone E; Mehta RH; Eggebrecht H
Am J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 121(12):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 29776652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Prior Aortic Root Surgery: Insights From Virtual Modeling.
Brener MI; Yamabe T; Leb J; Khalique OK; Takayama H; George I
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009539. PubMed ID: 33131300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
Malik AH; Yandrapalli S; Zaid S; Shetty SS; Aronow WS; Ahmad H; Tang GHL
Am J Cardiol; 2020 May; 125(9):1378-1384. PubMed ID: 32139158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early and Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Degeneration: Two Faces of the Same Medal.
Dokollari A; Cameli M; Mandoli GE; Kalra DS; Poston R; Coku L; Pernoci M; Miri M; Bonacchi M; Gelsomino S
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Nov; 35(11):3223-3231. PubMed ID: 34175205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses.
Silaschi M; Wendler O; Seiffert M; Castro L; Lubos E; Schirmer J; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H; Schäfer U; Treede H; MacCarthy P; Conradi L
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27624351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.
Hirji SA; Percy ED; Zogg CK; Malarczyk A; Harloff MT; Yazdchi F; Kaneko T
Eur Heart J; 2020 Aug; 41(29):2747-2755. PubMed ID: 32445575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
