These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34402588)

  • 21. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.
    Hirji SA; Percy ED; Zogg CK; Malarczyk A; Harloff MT; Yazdchi F; Kaneko T
    Eur Heart J; 2020 Aug; 41(29):2747-2755. PubMed ID: 32445575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta-analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Takagi H; Mitta S; Ando T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jun; 67(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 30114716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
    Hutt E; Mehra N; Desai MY
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Dec; 20(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 36433699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contemporary Outcome Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Demal TJ; Gordon C; Bhadra OD; Linder M; Ludwig S; Grundmann D; Voigtländer L; Waldschmidt L; Schirmer J; Schofer N; Seiffert M; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H; Westermann D; Conradi L
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 May; 171():115-121. PubMed ID: 35307189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Valve-in-Valve TAVR versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Early Outcomes.
    Cizmic A; Kuhn E; Eghbalzadeh K; Weber C; Rahmanian PB; Adam M; Mauri V; Rudolph T; Baldus S; Wahlers T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Mar; 71(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 34521136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Femoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation as alternative strategy for failed aortic bioprostheses: A single-centre experience with long-term follow-up.
    Stankowski T; Aboul-Hassan SS; Seifi Zinab F; Herwig V; Stępiński P; Grimmig O; Just S; Harnath A; Muehle A; Fritzsche D; Perek B
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 May; 306():25-34. PubMed ID: 32087937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus surgical redo aortic root replacement in patients with degenerated freestyle aortic bioprosthesis.
    Vukadinovikj A; Baumgártner E; Bohmann K; Härter D; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Burgdorf C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1472-1478. PubMed ID: 33522093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term prognosis in patients undergoing redo-isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Dokollari A; Torregrossa G; Sicouri S; Cameli M; Mandoli GE; Kjelstrom S; Prifti E; Veshti A; Bonacchi M; Gelsomino S
    Future Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 19(14):685-694. PubMed ID: 38078413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.
    Douglas PS; Leon MB; Mack MJ; Svensson LG; Webb JG; Hahn RT; Pibarot P; Weissman NJ; Miller DC; Kapadia S; Herrmann HC; Kodali SK; Makkar RR; Thourani VH; Lerakis S; Lowry AM; Rajeswaran J; Finn MT; Alu MC; Smith CR; Blackstone EH;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 2(11):1197-1206. PubMed ID: 28973520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation within stentless landing zones: Procedural insights from a single-center experience.
    Lang FM; Mihatov N; Kriegel J; Nazif TM; Vahl TP; Ng VG; Lebehn M; Blusztein D; Cahill TJ; Lehenbauer KR; Hahn RT; Leon M; Kodali SK; George I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Aug; 102(2):328-338. PubMed ID: 37393603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Conte JV; Hermiller J; Resar JR; Deeb GM; Gleason TG; Adams DH; Popma JJ; Yakubov SJ; Watson D; Guo J; Zorn GL; Reardon MJ
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Autumn; 29(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 29195573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nasir MM; Ikram A; Usman M; Sarwar J; Ahmed J; Hamza M; Farhan SA; Siddiqi R; Qadar LT; Shah SR; Khalid MR; Memon RS; Hameed I
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Aug; 225():151-159. PubMed ID: 38723857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
    Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Hawkins RB; Deeb GM; Sukul D; Patel HJ; Gualano SK; Chetcuti SJ; Grossman PM; Ailawadi G; Fukuhara S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Apr; 16(8):942-953. PubMed ID: 37100557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nalluri N; Atti V; Munir AB; Karam B; Patel NJ; Kumar V; Vemula P; Edla S; Asti D; Paturu A; Gayam S; Spagnola J; Barsoum E; Maniatis GA; Tamburrino F; Kandov R; Lafferty J; Kliger C
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 31(5):661-671. PubMed ID: 29781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interventional versus Surgical Treatment of Degenerated Freestyle Prosthesis.
    Fedorov D; Bauernschmitt R; Grunebaum JP; Bauer S; Sodian R; von Hodenberg E
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 72(3):188-196. PubMed ID: 36858066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Replacement for Degenerated Stentless Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
    Miller M; Snyder M; Horne BD; Harkness JR; Doty JR; Miner EC; Jones KW; O'Neal KR; Reid BB; Caine WT; Clayson SE; Lindley E; Gardner B; Connors RC; Bowles BJ; Whisenant BK
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(13):1217-1226. PubMed ID: 31272667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.
    Ando T; Adegbala O; Villablanca PA; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Grines CL; Schreiber T; Nazif T; Kodali S; Afonso L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):954-962. PubMed ID: 30408309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.
    Garcia S; Kelly R; Mbai M; Gurevich S; Oestreich B; Yannopoulos D; Adabag S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 29316204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-Analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo-surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve.
    Al-Abcha A; Saleh Y; Boumegouas M; Prasad R; Herzallah K; Baloch ZQ; Abdelkarim O; Rayamajhi S; Abela GS
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 May; 146():74-81. PubMed ID: 33529615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.