279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34402665)
1. Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rate in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts Using Prediction Models Based on Data from the DENSE Trial.
den Dekker BM; Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Veldhuis WB; van Diest PJ; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MBI; Loo CE; Mann RM; Monninkhof EM; Veltman J; Pijnappel RM; van Gils CH;
Radiology; 2021 Nov; 301(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 34402665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supplemental Breast MRI for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts: Results of the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial.
Veenhuizen SGA; de Lange SV; Bakker MF; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Monninkhof EM; Emaus MJ; de Koekkoek-Doll PK; Bisschops RHC; Lobbes MBI; de Jong MDF; Duvivier KM; Veltman J; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van Diest PJ; Mali WPTM; van den Bosch MAAJ; van Gils CH; Veldhuis WB;
Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):278-286. PubMed ID: 33724062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deep Learning for Automated Triaging of 4581 Breast MRI Examinations from the DENSE Trial.
Verburg E; van Gils CH; van der Velden BHM; Bakker MF; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
Radiology; 2022 Jan; 302(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 34609196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.
Verburg E; van Gils CH; Bakker MF; Viergever MA; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):438-444. PubMed ID: 32149858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Peeters PHM; Monninkhof EM; Emaus MJ; Loo CE; Bisschops RHC; Lobbes MBI; de Jong MDF; Duvivier KM; Veltman J; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van Diest PJ; Mali WPTM; van den Bosch MAAJ; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH;
N Engl J Med; 2019 Nov; 381(22):2091-2102. PubMed ID: 31774954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reasons for (non)participation in supplemental population-based MRI breast screening for women with extremely dense breasts.
de Lange SV; Bakker MF; Monninkhof EM; Peeters PHM; de Koekkoek-Doll PK; Mann RM; Rutten MJCM; Bisschops RHC; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MBI; de Koning HJ; Karssemeijer N; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
Clin Radiol; 2018 Aug; 73(8):759.e1-759.e9. PubMed ID: 29759590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hussein H; Abbas E; Keshavarzi S; Fazelzad R; Bukhanov K; Kulkarni S; Au F; Ghai S; Alabousi A; Freitas V
Radiology; 2023 Mar; 306(3):e221785. PubMed ID: 36719288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing Quantitative Parenchymal Features at Baseline Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI and Cancer Occurrence in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts.
Wang H; van der Velden BHM; Verburg E; Bakker MF; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH; Gilhuijs KGA
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e222841. PubMed ID: 37552061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.
Yamashita MW; Larsen LH; Perez J; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y
Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231680. PubMed ID: 38888480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
Berg WA; Zhang Z; Lehrer D; Jong RA; Pisano ED; Barr RG; Böhm-Vélez M; Mahoney MC; Evans WP; Larsen LH; Morton MJ; Mendelson EB; Farria DM; Cormack JB; Marques HS; Adams A; Yeh NM; Gabrielli G;
JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(13):1394-404. PubMed ID: 22474203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer detection rate of breast-MR in supplemental screening after negative mammography in women with dense breasts. Preliminary results of the MA-DETECT-Study after 200 participants.
Kaiser C; Wilhelm T; Walter S; Singer S; Keller E; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jul; 176():111476. PubMed ID: 38710116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
