129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34403112)
1. Second-Order Disjoint Factor Analysis.
Cavicchia C; Vichi M
Psychometrika; 2022 Mar; 87(1):289-309. PubMed ID: 34403112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models.
Epskamp S; Rhemtulla M; Borsboom D
Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):904-927. PubMed ID: 28290111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stochastic search item selection for factor analytic models.
Mavridis D; Ntzoufras I
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):284-303. PubMed ID: 23837882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A general class of latent variable models for ordinal manifest variables with covariate effects on the manifest and latent variables.
Moustaki I
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):337-57. PubMed ID: 14633339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CFA Models with a General Factor and Multiple Sets of Secondary Factors.
Jeon M; Rijmen F; Rabe-Hesketh S
Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):785-808. PubMed ID: 30120699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing manifest monotonicity using order-constrained statistical inference.
Tijmstra J; Hessen DJ; van der Heijden PG; Sijtsma K
Psychometrika; 2013 Jan; 78(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 25107519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Model Implied Instrumental Variable Approach to Exploratory Factor Analysis (MIIV-EFA).
Bollen KA; Gates KM; Luo L
Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):687-716. PubMed ID: 38532229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterizing the Manifest Probability Distributions of Three Latent Trait Models for Accuracy and Response Time.
Marsman M; Sigurdardóttir H; Bolsinova M; Maris G
Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):870-891. PubMed ID: 30919229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional Rasch models to investigate the dimensionality of test-taking motivation.
Demars CE
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 23816595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Probabilistic Disjoint Principal Component Analysis.
Ferrara C; Martella F; Vichi M
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 30403882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring depression in adolescence: Evaluation of a hierarchical factor model of the Children's Depression Inventory and measurement invariance across boys and girls.
Jelínek M; Květon P; Burešová I; Klimusová H
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249943. PubMed ID: 33831100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint analysis of mixed types of outcomes with latent variables.
Pan D; Wei Y; Song X
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1272-1284. PubMed ID: 33296950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What Does the WRAML2 Core Battery Measure? Utilizing Exploratory and Confirmatory Techniques to Disclose Higher Order Structure.
McGill RJ; Dombrowski SC
Assessment; 2018 Sep; 25(6):729-743. PubMed ID: 27866172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing Interpretability in Factor Analysis by Means of Mathematical Optimization.
Carrizosa E; Guerrero V; Romero Morales D; Satorra A
Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(5):748-762. PubMed ID: 31663785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Riemannian Newton and trust-region algorithms for analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis.
Liu Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Feb; 74(1):139-163. PubMed ID: 32715469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
Meredith W; Teresi JA
Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mixture proportional hazards cure model with latent variables.
He H; Han D; Song X; Sun L
Stat Med; 2021 Dec; 40(29):6590-6604. PubMed ID: 34528248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Further insights on the French WISC-IV factor structure through Bayesian structural equation modeling.
Golay P; Reverte I; Rossier J; Favez N; Lecerf T
Psychol Assess; 2013 Jun; 25(2):496-508. PubMed ID: 23148651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factor Tree Copula Models for Item Response Data.
Kadhem SH; Nikoloulopoulos AK
Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):776-802. PubMed ID: 37261648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
