396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34406059)
21. Monoenergetic extrapolation of cardiac dual energy CT for artifact reduction.
Secchi F; De Cecco CN; Spearman JV; Silverman JR; Ebersberger U; Sardanelli F; Schoepf UJ
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 24615417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Exact dual energy material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR).
Maass C; Meyer E; Kachelriess M
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 21452706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rapid switching kVp dual energy CT: Value of reconstructed dual energy CT images and organ dose assessment in multiphasic liver CT exams.
Mahmood U; Horvat N; Horvat JV; Ryan D; Gao Y; Carollo G; DeOcampo R; Do RK; Katz S; Gerst S; Schmidtlein CR; Dauer L; Erdi Y; Mannelli L
Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():102-108. PubMed ID: 29685522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spectral material characterization with dual-energy CT: comparison of commercial and investigative technologies in phantoms.
Gabbai M; Leichter I; Mahgerefteh S; Sosna J
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):960-9. PubMed ID: 25182803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Iodine quantification and detectability thresholds among major dual-energy CT platforms.
Taylor RE; Mager P; Yu NC; Katz DP; Brady JR; Gupta N
Br J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 92(1104):20190530. PubMed ID: 31559858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combination of Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstruction Using Split-Filter Dual-Energy CT in Patients With Dental Artifact on Head and Neck CT.
Schmidt AMA; Grunz JP; Petritsch B; Gruschwitz P; Knarr J; Huflage H; Bley TA; Kosmala A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Apr; 218(4):716-727. PubMed ID: 34755521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative accuracy and dose efficiency of dual-contrast imaging using dual-energy CT: a phantom study.
Ren L; Rajendran K; McCollough CH; Yu L
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):441-456. PubMed ID: 31705664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative Comparison of Virtual Monochromatic Images of Dual Energy Computed Tomography Systems: Beam Hardening Artifact Correction and Variance in Computed Tomography Numbers: A Phantom Study.
Wu R; Watanabe Y; Satoh K; Liao YP; Takahashi H; Tanaka H; Tomiyama N
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(4):648-654. PubMed ID: 29787496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Feasibility of coronary artery calcium scoring on virtual unenhanced images derived from single-source fast kVp-switching dual-energy coronary CT angiography.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Okamura T; Yamada M; Tanami Y; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 25301045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Determination of the optimal range for virtual monoenergetic images in dual-energy CT based on physical quality parameters.
Fernandez-Velilla Cepria E; González-Ballester MÁ; Quera Jordana J; Pera O; Sanz Latiesas X; Foro Arnalot P; Membrive Conejo I; Rodriguez de Dios N; Reig Castillejo A; Algara Lopez M
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5085-5095. PubMed ID: 34287956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual energy CT angiography: pros and cons of dual-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm in patients after endovascular aortic repair.
Boos J; Fang J; Heidinger BH; Raptopoulos V; Brook OR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Mar; 42(3):749-758. PubMed ID: 27896386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dual-energy CT: general principles.
Johnson TR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5 Suppl):S3-8. PubMed ID: 23097165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of enhancement quantification from virtual unenhanced images to true unenhanced images in multiphase renal Dual-Energy computed tomography: A phantom study.
Olivia Popnoe D; Ng CS; Zhou S; Cheenu Kappadath S; Pan T; Kyle Jones A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):171-179. PubMed ID: 31423728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Value of virtual monochromatic spectral images with metal artifact reduction algorithm in dual-energy computed tomography-guided microcoil localization of pulmonary nodules.
Liu Z; Zhang Z; Chen C; Hong N
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11562. PubMed ID: 30024555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visualization of joint and bone using dual-energy CT arthrography with contrast subtraction: in vitro feasibility study using porcine joints.
Chai JW; Choi JA; Choi JY; Kim S; Hong SH; Kang HS
Skeletal Radiol; 2014 May; 43(5):673-8. PubMed ID: 24463780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Strategies to Improve Image Quality on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography.
Patel BN; Marin D
Radiol Clin North Am; 2018 Jul; 56(4):641-647. PubMed ID: 29936952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correlation of quantitative dual-energy computed tomography iodine maps and abdominal computed tomography perfusion measurements: are single-acquisition dual-energy computed tomography iodine maps more than a reduced-dose surrogate of conventional computed tomography perfusion?
Stiller W; Skornitzke S; Fritz F; Klauss M; Hansen J; Pahn G; Grenacher L; Kauczor HU
Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):703-8. PubMed ID: 26039774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An adult and pediatric size-based contrast administration reduction phantom study for single and dual-energy CT through preservation of contrast-to-noise ratio.
Wang J; Duan X; Mahmood U; McKenney SE; Brady SL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14340. PubMed ID: 38605540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Basic Principles, Applications and Concerns.
Mansouri M; Aran S; Singh A; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV; Lev MH; Abujudeh HH
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2015; 44(6):496-500. PubMed ID: 26183068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Virtual Monochromatic Images from Dual-Energy Multidetector CT: Variance in CT Numbers from the Same Lesion between Single-Source Projection-based and Dual-Source Image-based Implementations.
Mileto A; Barina A; Marin D; Stinnett SS; Roy Choudhury K; Wilson JM; Nelson RC
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):269-77. PubMed ID: 26536403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]