BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

719 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34406400)

  • 1. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.
    Glechner A; Wagner G; Mitus JW; Teufer B; Klerings I; Böck N; Grillich L; Berzaczy D; Helbich TH; Gartlehner G
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 3(3):CD009632. PubMed ID: 36999589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial.
    Ohuchi N; Suzuki A; Sobue T; Kawai M; Yamamoto S; Zheng YF; Shiono YN; Saito H; Kuriyama S; Tohno E; Endo T; Fukao A; Tsuji I; Yamaguchi T; Ohashi Y; Fukuda M; Ishida T;
    Lancet; 2016 Jan; 387(10016):341-348. PubMed ID: 26547101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
    Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
    Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening Outcomes of Supplemental Automated Breast US in Asian Women with Dense and Nondense Breasts.
    Kwon MR; Choi JS; Lee MY; Kim S; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222435. PubMed ID: 37097135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.
    Lee JM; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Smith RA; Henderson LM; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA Intern Med; 2019 May; 179(5):658-667. PubMed ID: 30882843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of breast density on the benefits of mammograms with adjunctive ultrasonography in breast screening.
    Nakamura A; Ohnuki K; Takahashi H; Usami S; Ishida Y; Shibata S; Umemura A; Takikawa Y; Kano A
    Breast Cancer; 2024 Mar; 31(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 38012337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.
    Ho TH; Bissell MCS; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Sprague BL; Lee CI; Tice JA; Tosteson ANA; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e222440. PubMed ID: 35333365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
    Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
    Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.
    Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Pijnappel RM; Mann RM; Peeters PHM; Monninkhof EM; Emaus MJ; Loo CE; Bisschops RHC; Lobbes MBI; de Jong MDF; Duvivier KM; Veltman J; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van Diest PJ; Mali WPTM; van den Bosch MAAJ; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH;
    N Engl J Med; 2019 Nov; 381(22):2091-2102. PubMed ID: 31774954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
    Berg WA; Zhang Z; Lehrer D; Jong RA; Pisano ED; Barr RG; Böhm-Vélez M; Mahoney MC; Evans WP; Larsen LH; Morton MJ; Mendelson EB; Farria DM; Cormack JB; Marques HS; Adams A; Yeh NM; Gabrielli G;
    JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(13):1394-404. PubMed ID: 22474203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.