These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34406459)

  • 1. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Lu A; Zhao H; Zhan X; Duan H; Li P; Zhao W; Yao J; Li D; Jiang H; Liu M; Bin X; Lang J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 34406459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
    Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
    Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.
    Wenzel HHB; Smolders RGV; Beltman JJ; Lambrechts S; Trum HW; Yigit R; Zusterzeel PLM; Zweemer RP; Mom CH; Bekkers RLM; Lemmens VEPP; Nijman HW; Van der Aa MA
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 133():14-21. PubMed ID: 32422504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical adenosquamous carcinoma at stage IA2 to IIA2: A multicenter retrospective study.
    Teng X; Kang S; Li W; Ding H; Ling B; Zhu L; Wang D; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jun; 49(6):1592-1610. PubMed ID: 36919234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
    Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 （LVSI
    Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    He F; Yuan S; Chen X; Zhang S; Han Y; Lin T; Xu B; Huang S; Pan Z
    Cancer Med; 2022 Jun; 11(11):2224-2232. PubMed ID: 35156771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):971-981.e3. PubMed ID: 33321255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
    Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
    Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.
    Li P; Zhan X; Lv C; Lin Z; Yang Y; Wang W; Wang S; Hao M; Zhu B; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():879569. PubMed ID: 35847917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Laparoscopies and Laparotomies for Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Team With 18 Years of Experience.
    Qin M; Siyi L; Huang HF; Li Y; Gu Y; Wang W; Shan Y; Yin J; Wang YX; Cai Y; Chen JY; Jin Y; Pan LY
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1738. PubMed ID: 32984056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.