These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34407858)

  • 1. An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff.
    O' Sullivan L; Feeney L; Crowley RK; Sukumar P; McAuliffe E; Doran P
    Trials; 2021 Aug; 22(1):544. PubMed ID: 34407858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of Videos Improves Informed Consent Comprehension in Web-Based Surveys Among Internet-Using Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hall EW; Sanchez TH; Stein AD; Stephenson R; Zlotorzynska M; Sineath RC; Sullivan PS
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e64. PubMed ID: 28264794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania.
    Vallely A; Lees S; Shagi C; Kasindi S; Soteli S; Kavit N; Vallely L; McCormack S; Pool R; Hayes RJ;
    BMC Med Ethics; 2010 Jun; 11():10. PubMed ID: 20540803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guardians and research staff experiences and views about the consent process in hospital-based paediatric research studies in urban Malawi: A qualitative study.
    Gondwe MJ; Toto NM; Gunda C; Gmeiner M; MacCormick IJC; Lalloo D; Parker M; Desmond N
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):125. PubMed ID: 36471294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems in comprehension of informed consent in rural and peri-urban Mali, West Africa.
    Krosin MT; Klitzman R; Levin B; Cheng J; Ranney ML
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 16895047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals.
    Lawton J; Snowdon C; Morrow S; Norman JE; Denison FC; Hallowell N
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():195. PubMed ID: 27066777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed Consent among Clinical Trial Participants with Different Cancer Diagnoses.
    Ulrich CM; Ratcliffe SJ; Hochheimer CJ; Zhou Q; Huang L; Gordon T; Knafl K; Richmond T; Schapira MM; Miller V; Mao JJ; Naylor M; Grady C
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2024; 15(3):165-177. PubMed ID: 37921867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic informed consent: effects on enrolment, practical and economic benefits, challenges, and drawbacks-a systematic review of studies within randomized controlled trials.
    Mazzochi AT; Dennis M; Chun HY
    Trials; 2023 Feb; 24(1):127. PubMed ID: 36810093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of closed-ended, open-ended, and perceived informed consent comprehension measures for a mock HIV prevention trial among women in Tanzania.
    MacQueen KM; Chen M; Ramirez C; Nnko SE; Earp KM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105720. PubMed ID: 25157899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project.
    Ulph F; Wright S; Dharni N; Payne K; Bennett R; Roberts S; Walshe K; Lavender T
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Oct; 21(55):1-240. PubMed ID: 28967862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views.
    Anderson EE; Newman SB; Matthews AK
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(3):178-188. PubMed ID: 28949896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding and retention of trial-related information among participants in a clinical trial after completing the informed consent process.
    Mexas F; Efron A; Luiz RR; Cailleaux-Cezar M; Chaisson RE; Conde MB
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 24296322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stakeholders' perspectives on clinical trial acceptability and approach to consent within a limited timeframe: a mixed methods study.
    Deja E; Donohue C; Semple MG; Woolfall K;
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e077023. PubMed ID: 38167280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients acceptance and comprehension to written and verbal consent (PAC-VC).
    Kashur R; Ezekowitz J; Kimber S; Welsh RC
    BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Feb; 24(1):14. PubMed ID: 36814295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiologists' and patients' views about the informed consent process and their understanding of the anticipated treatment benefits of coronary angioplasty: A survey study.
    Astin F; Stephenson J; Probyn J; Holt J; Marshall K; Conway D
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Mar; 19(3):260-268. PubMed ID: 31775522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A survey of study participants' understanding of informed consent to participate in a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture.
    Smith CA; Fogarty S
    BMC Complement Altern Med; 2016 Jan; 16():10. PubMed ID: 26753767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed Consent in Two Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers: Insights From Research Coordinators.
    Suver CM; Hamann JK; Chin EM; Goldstein FC; Blazel HM; Manzanares CM; Doerr MJ; Asthana SJ; Mangravite LM; Levey AI; Lah JJ; Edwards DF
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):114-124. PubMed ID: 32175821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research.
    Perrault EK; Keating DM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 29117849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When describing harms and benefits to potential trial participants, participant information leaflets are inadequate.
    Cuddihy L; Howick J; Murphy E; Shiely F
    Trials; 2024 May; 25(1):292. PubMed ID: 38693579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Written versus verbal consent: a qualitative study of stakeholder views of consent procedures used at the time of recruitment into a peripartum trial conducted in an emergency setting.
    Lawton J; Hallowell N; Snowdon C; Norman JE; Carruthers K; Denison FC
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 May; 18(1):36. PubMed ID: 28539111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.