These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34407913)

  • 1. Validity and reliability of Japanese version of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool.
    Yamamoto-Kon A; Fukahori H; Ogata Y; Nagano M
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Nov; 30(4):566-570. PubMed ID: 34407913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0).
    Dalli ÖE; Yildirim Y; Çalişkan G; Girgin NK
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 34429220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pressure ulcer prevention: development and psychometric validation of a knowledge assessment instrument.
    Beeckman D; Vanderwee K; Demarré L; Paquay L; Van Hecke A; Defloor T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Apr; 47(4):399-410. PubMed ID: 19781701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure ulcer prevention knowledge assessment instrument.
    Tulek Z; Polat C; Ozkan I; Theofanidis D; Togrol RE
    J Tissue Viability; 2016 Nov; 25(4):201-208. PubMed ID: 27671870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical device-related pressure injury knowledge assessment for nurses: development and psychometric validation of a multiple choice test.
    Dalli ÖE; Girgin NK
    J Wound Care; 2023 Jun; 32(Sup6a):lxxv-lxxxvi. PubMed ID: 37306382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure injury knowledge assessment tool 2.0.
    Ursavaş FE; Bayrak D
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Nov; 30(4):582-587. PubMed ID: 33994078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.
    Luo RZ; Liu JY; Zhang CM; Liu YH
    Nurse Educ Today; 2021 Mar; 98():104734. PubMed ID: 33465678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument in nurses.
    Akhkand SS; Seidi J; Ebadi A; Ghanei Gheshlagh R
    J Tissue Viability; 2021 Feb; 30(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 33187791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development and validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire: Japanese version.
    Tomotaki A; Fukahori H; Sakai I; Kurokohchi K
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):e12617. PubMed ID: 29341348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of The Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire(PIPK).
    Bahar A; Özgürbüz NE
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34801351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Nursing Performance Instrument.
    Sugimura N; Sato M; Sumi N; Yano R
    Jpn J Nurs Sci; 2023 Apr; 20(2):e12518. PubMed ID: 36344443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Swedish version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument for use in an operating room context (APUP-OR): A nationwide psychometric evaluation.
    Falk-Brynhildsen K; Raepsaet C; Wistrand C; Leo Swenne C; Gifford M; Gunningberg L; Bååth C; von Vogelsang AC; Björn C; Beeckman D
    J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 34969580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and psychometric property testing of a Medical Device-related Pressure Injuries Knowledge and Practice Assessment Tool.
    Demirer E; Karadağ A; Aktan DÇ; Çakar V
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2023 Jun; 29(3):e13145. PubMed ID: 36890656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Chinese Version of the Palliative Nursing Care Quality Scale: Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validity.
    Liu Q; Zhang M; Guo X; Zhang Y; Qin T; Wang Y; Gai Y
    J Palliat Care; 2024 Jan; 39(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 37828752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Descriptive, Cross-sectional Survey of Turkish Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Ulcer Risk, Prevention, and Staging.
    Gul A; Andsoy II; Ozkaya B; Zeydan A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Jun; 63(6):40-46. PubMed ID: 28657899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and Reliability of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test for Use in Turkey.
    Yeşil M; Toygar İ; Aslan FE
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2024 Mar; 37(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 38393708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2·0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention.
    Manderlier B; Van Damme N; Vanderwee K; Verhaeghe S; Van Hecke A; Beeckman D
    Int Wound J; 2017 Dec; 14(6):1041-1051. PubMed ID: 28547752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity and reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life instrument: A methodological study.
    Gül Ş; Avşar P; Karadağ A; Karaçay P; Gökmen D
    J Tissue Viability; 2023 Feb; 32(1):102-106. PubMed ID: 36535811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.
    Chiba R; Miyamoto Y; Kawakami N
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 19679304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross-sectional survey.
    Huang X; Zan T; Tang J; Zhang D; Zu W; Wang T; Wang L; Nie W
    Int Wound J; 2022 Dec; 19(8):2019-2030. PubMed ID: 35307948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.