303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34408062)
1. Protocol for a national cohort study to explore the long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness of implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: the brighter study.
Johnson L; Holcombe C; O'Donoghue JM; Jeevan R; Browne J; Fairbrother P; MacKenzie M; Gulliver-Clarke C; White P; Mohiuddin S; Hollingworth W; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e054055. PubMed ID: 34408062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study).
Davies C; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Whisker L; Hollingworth W; Conefrey C; Mills N; White P; Comins C; Macmillan D; Fairbrother P; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e046622. PubMed ID: 33863715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life after Four Common Surgical Treatment Options for Breast Cancer and the Effect of Complications: A Retrospective Patient-Reported Survey among 1871 Patients.
Kouwenberg CAE; de Ligt KM; Kranenburg LW; Rakhorst H; de Leeuw D; Siesling S; Busschbach JJ; Mureau MAM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jul; 146(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 32590633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "The validity of the EQ-5D-5L in measuring quality of life benefits of breast reconstruction".
Kouwenberg CAE; Kranenburg LW; Visser MS; Busschbach JJ; Mureau MAM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jan; 72(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 30270015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study.
Johnson L; White P; Jeevan R; Browne J; Gulliver-Clarke C; O'Donoghue J; Mohiuddin S; Hollingworth W; Fairbrother P; MacKenzie M; Holcombe C; Potter S
Br J Surg; 2023 Nov; 110(12):1815-1823. PubMed ID: 37766501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Pre-BRA (pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction EvAluation) feasibility study: protocol for a mixed-methods IDEAL 2a/2b prospective cohort study to determine the safety and effectiveness of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Harvey KL; Mills N; White P; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033641. PubMed ID: 31988232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
Santosa KB; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL
JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):891-899. PubMed ID: 29926096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of procedure type on revisional surgery and secondary reconstruction after immediate breast reconstruction in a population-based cohort.
Johnson L; White P; Holcombe C; O'Donoghue J; Jeevan R; Browne J; Fairbrother P; MacKenzie M; Gulliver-Clarke C; Mohiuddin S; Hollingworth W; Potter S
Br J Surg; 2023 May; 110(6):666-675. PubMed ID: 36998148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The iBRA-2 (immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy audit) study: protocol for a prospective national multicentre cohort study to evaluate the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the delivery of adjuvant therapy.
Dave R; O'Connell R; Rattay T; Tolkien Z; Barnes N; Skillman J; Williamson P; Conroy E; Gardiner M; Harnett A; O'Brien C; Blazeby J; Potter S; Holcombe C;
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012678. PubMed ID: 27855106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
Pusic AL; Matros E; Fine N; Buchel E; Gordillo GM; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Qi J; Albornoz C; Klassen AF; Wilkins EG
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 35(22):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 28346808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, cohort study to investigate patient satisfaction and quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction in Japan: the SAQLA study.
Saiga M; Hosoya Y; Utsunomiya H; Kuramoto Y; Watanabe S; Tomita K; Aihara Y; Muto M; Hikosaka M; Kawaguchi T; Miyaji T; Yamaguchi T; Zenda S; Goto A; Sakuraba M; Kusano T; Miyabe K; Kuroki T; Yano T; Taminato M; Sekido M; Tsunoda Y; Satake T; Doihara H; Kimata Y
BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e042099. PubMed ID: 33589456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chinese multicentre prospective registry of breast cancer patient-reported outcome-reconstruction and oncoplastic cohort (PRO-ROC): a study protocol.
Li L; Yang B; Li H; Yin J; Jin F; Han S; Liao N; Shi J; Ling R; Li Z; Ouyang L; Wang X; Fu P; Ouyang Z; Ma B; Wu X; Wang H; Liu J; Shao Z; Wu J
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e032945. PubMed ID: 31843846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
Roberts K; Mills N; Metcalfe C; Lane A; Clement C; Hollingworth W; Taylor J; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Fairhurst K; Whisker L; Cutress R; Thrush S; Fairbrother P; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050886. PubMed ID: 34848516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Higher reconstruction failure and less patient-reported satisfaction after post mastectomy radiotherapy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction compared to immediate autologous breast reconstruction.
Reinders FCJ; Young-Afat DA; Batenburg MCT; Bruekers SE; van Amerongen EA; Macaré van Maurik JFM; Braakenburg A; Zonnevylle E; Hoefkens M; Teunis T; Verkooijen HM; van den Bongard HJGD; Maarse W
Breast Cancer; 2020 May; 27(3):435-444. PubMed ID: 31858435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-utility analysis of four common surgical treatment pathways for breast cancer.
Kouwenberg CAE; Mureau MAM; Kranenburg LW; Rakhorst H; de Leeuw D; Klem TMAL; Koppert LB; Ramos IC; Busschbach JJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 47(6):1299-1308. PubMed ID: 33349523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National long-term patient-reported outcomes following mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: The Swedish Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study Part 2 (SweBRO 2).
Gümüscü R; Unukovych D; Wärnberg F; de Boniface J; Sund M; Åhsberg K; Hansson E; Folkvaljon F; Mani M
BJS Open; 2024 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 38415759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Ter Stege JA; Woerdeman LAE; Hahn DEE; van Huizum MA; van Duijnhoven FH; Kieffer JM; Retèl VP; Sherman KA; Witkamp AJ; Oldenburg HSA; Bleiker EMA
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Aug; 19(1):165. PubMed ID: 31426772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes following mastectomy for breast cancer, with immediate, delayed or no breast reconstruction: Four-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study.
Dempsey K; Mathieu E; Brennan M; Snook K; Hoffman J; Campbell I; Scarlet J; Flay H; Wong A; Boyle F; King M; Spillane A
Breast; 2023 Oct; 71():122-131. PubMed ID: 37573653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction in older women: Audit of a large metropolitan public/private practice in Sydney, Australia.
Oh DD; Flitcroft K; Brennan ME; Snook KL; Spillane AJ
Psychooncology; 2018 Dec; 27(12):2815-2822. PubMed ID: 30225915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstructive utilisation and outcomes following mastectomy surgery in women with breast cancer treated in England.
Jeevan R
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2020 Feb; 102(2):110-114. PubMed ID: 31418290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
