202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34408238)
1. Survival analysis in breast cancer using proteomic data from four independent datasets.
Ősz Á; Lánczky A; Győrffy B
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):16787. PubMed ID: 34408238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical validation of an RT-qPCR in vitro diagnostic test system for the determination of breast cancer molecular subtypes by quantification of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 mRNA levels from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens.
Laible M; Schlombs K; Kaiser K; Veltrup E; Herlein S; Lakis S; Stöhr R; Eidt S; Hartmann A; Wirtz RM; Sahin U
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():398. PubMed ID: 27389414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of central laboratory assessments of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 by IHC/FISH and the corresponding mRNAs (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67) by RT-qPCR on an automated, broadly deployed diagnostic platform.
Wu NC; Wong W; Ho KE; Chu VC; Rizo A; Davenport S; Kelly D; Makar R; Jassem J; Duchnowska R; Biernat W; Radecka B; Fujita T; Klein JL; Stonecypher M; Ohta S; Juhl H; Weidler JM; Bates M; Press MF
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Nov; 172(2):327-338. PubMed ID: 30120700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 and evaluating subtypes in patients with breast cancer.
Chen L; Chen Y; Xie Z; Luo J; Wang Y; Zhou J; Huang L; Li H; Wang L; Liu P; Shu M; Zhang W; Ke Z
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Aug; 194(3):517-529. PubMed ID: 35789315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biological subtyping of early breast cancer: a study comparing RT-qPCR with immunohistochemistry.
Wirtz RM; Sihto H; Isola J; Heikkilä P; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL; Auvinen P; Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T; Jyrkkiö S; Lakis S; Schlombs K; Laible M; Weber S; Eidt S; Sahin U; Joensuu H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 27220750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNA expression in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: results from ABCSG Trial 6.
Filipits M; Rudas M; Singer CF; Fitzal F; Bago-Horvath Z; Greil R; Balic M; Lax SF; Halper S; Hulla W; Wu NC; Liu X; Weidler J; Bates M; Hlauschek D; Gnant M; Dubsky P
ESMO Open; 2021 Aug; 6(4):100228. PubMed ID: 34371382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An international reproducibility study validating quantitative determination of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR, and MKI67 mRNA in breast cancer using MammaTyper®.
Varga Z; Lebeau A; Bu H; Hartmann A; Penault-Llorca F; Guerini-Rocco E; Schraml P; Symmans F; Stoehr R; Teng X; Turzynski A; von Wasielewski R; Gürtler C; Laible M; Schlombs K; Joensuu H; Keller T; Sinn P; Sahin U; Bartlett J; Viale G
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 May; 19(1):55. PubMed ID: 28490348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved Risk Stratification for Breast Cancer Samples Based on the Expression Ratio of the Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor.
Bendrat K; Fritz P; Müller S; Brockmöller S; Debus A; Friedrichs K; Lindner C; Brinkmann F; Heidemann E; Niendorf A
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):3855-63. PubMed ID: 27466487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with PCR for assessment of ER, PR, and Ki-67 and prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer.
Sinn HP; Schneeweiss A; Keller M; Schlombs K; Laible M; Seitz J; Lakis S; Veltrup E; Altevogt P; Eidt S; Wirtz RM; Marmé F
BMC Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28193205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prognostic and predictive impact of genomic or central grade and immunohistochemical subtypes or IHC4 in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: WSG-AGO EC-Doc Trial.
Gluz O; Liedtke C; Huober J; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Kates RE; Kreipe HH; Hartmann A; Pelz E; Erber R; Mohrmann S; Möbus V; Augustin D; Hoffmann G; Thomssen C; Jänicke F; Kiechle M; Wallwiener D; Kuhn W; Nitz U; Harbeck N
Ann Oncol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 27022068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estrogen receptor 1 and progesterone receptor are distinct biomarkers and prognostic factors in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: Evidence from a bioinformatic analysis.
Wu JR; Zhao Y; Zhou XP; Qin X
Biomed Pharmacother; 2020 Jan; 121():109647. PubMed ID: 31733575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High Ki-67 Expression and Low Progesterone Receptor Expression Could Independently Lead to a Worse Prognosis for Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Nishimukai A; Yagi T; Yanai A; Miyagawa Y; Enomoto Y; Murase K; Imamura M; Takatsuka Y; Sakita I; Hatada T; Miyoshi Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 25600243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prognostic values between combined immunohistochemical score of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Ki-67 and the corresponding gene expression score in breast cancer.
Yamamoto-Ibusuki M; Yamamoto Y; Yamamoto S; Fujiwara S; Fu P; Honda Y; Iyama K; Iwase H
Mod Pathol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22918168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The detection of ESR1/PGR/ERBB2 mRNA levels by RT-QPCR: a better approach for subtyping breast cancer and predicting prognosis.
Du X; Li XQ; Li L; Xu YY; Feng YM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Feb; 138(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 23397283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robustness of biomarker determination in breast cancer by RT-qPCR: impact of tumor cell content, DCIS and non-neoplastic breast tissue.
Hartmann K; Schlombs K; Laible M; Gürtler C; Schmidt M; Sahin U; Lehr HA
Diagn Pathol; 2018 Oct; 13(1):83. PubMed ID: 30342538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prognostic impact of age in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Liedtke C; Rody A; Gluz O; Baumann K; Beyer D; Kohls EB; Lausen K; Hanker L; Holtrich U; Becker S; Karn T
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Aug; 152(3):667-73. PubMed ID: 26195120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PAM50 breast cancer subtyping by RT-qPCR and concordance with standard clinical molecular markers.
Bastien RR; Rodríguez-Lescure Á; Ebbert MT; Prat A; Munárriz B; Rowe L; Miller P; Ruiz-Borrego M; Anderson D; Lyons B; Álvarez I; Dowell T; Wall D; Seguí MÁ; Barley L; Boucher KM; Alba E; Pappas L; Davis CA; Aranda I; Fauron C; Stijleman IJ; Palacios J; Antón A; Carrasco E; Caballero R; Ellis MJ; Nielsen TO; Perou CM; Astill M; Bernard PS; Martín M
BMC Med Genomics; 2012 Oct; 5():44. PubMed ID: 23035882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive and progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from ten prospectively randomized controlled neoadjuvant trials.
van Mackelenbergh MT; Denkert C; Nekljudova V; Karn T; Schem C; Marmé F; Stickeler E; Jackisch C; Hanusch C; Huober J; Fasching PA; Blohmer JU; Kümmel S; Müller V; Schneeweiss A; Untch M; von Minckwitz G; Weber KE; Loibl S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 167(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28875243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Over-Expressed Twist Associates with Markers of Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and Predicts Poor Prognosis in Breast Cancers via ERK and Akt Activation.
Zhang YQ; Wei XL; Liang YK; Chen WL; Zhang F; Bai JW; Qiu SQ; Du CW; Huang WH; Zhang GJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135851. PubMed ID: 26295469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of GATA3, P53, Ki67 status and vascular peritumoral invasion are strongly prognostic in luminal breast cancer.
Jacquemier J; Charafe-Jauffret E; Monville F; Esterni B; Extra JM; Houvenaeghel G; Xerri L; Bertucci F; Birnbaum D
Breast Cancer Res; 2009; 11(2):R23. PubMed ID: 19405945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
