134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34409435)
1. Comprehensive analysis of haemodynamics in patients with physiologically curved prostheses of the ascending aorta.
Sieren MM; Balks MF; Schlueter JK; Wegner F; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A; Gabbert DD; Oechtering TH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jun; 62(1):. PubMed ID: 34409435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) reveals altered blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta of patients with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Oechtering TH; Sieren MM; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 159(3):798-810.e1. PubMed ID: 31078313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study.
Sieren MM; Schultz V; Fujita B; Wegner F; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A; Oechtering TH
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Aug; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 32772927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 4D-flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after aortic root replacement with long-valved decellularized aortic homografts: comparison to valve-sparing aortic root replacement and healthy controls.
Cvitkovic T; Bobylev D; Horke A; Avsar M; Beerbaum P; Martens A; Böthig D; Petenà E; Gutberlet M; Beyer FH; Wacker F; Cebotari S; Haverich A; Vogel-Claussen J; Sarikouch S; Czerner C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 May; 61(6):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 35079774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis.
Oechtering TH; Hons CF; Sieren M; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Drexl J; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 152(2):418-427.e1. PubMed ID: 27423836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction of aberrant aortic haemodynamics following aortic root replacement with a mechanical valved conduit.
Keller EJ; Malaisrie SC; Kruse J; McCarthy PM; Carr JC; Markl M; Barker AJ; Collins JD
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Sep; 23(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 27245620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Haemodynamic outcome at four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging following valve-sparing aortic root replacement with tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology.
Semaan E; Markl M; Malaisrie SC; Barker A; Allen B; McCarthy P; Carr JC; Collins JD
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 May; 45(5):818-25. PubMed ID: 24317086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Hemodynamics After Aortic Root Replacement Using Valve-Sparing or Bioprosthetic Valved Conduit.
Collins JD; Semaan E; Barker A; McCarthy PM; Carr JC; Markl M; Malaisrie SC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Nov; 100(5):1556-62. PubMed ID: 26212514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Trauzeddel RF; Barker AJ; Gruettner H; Markl M; Schulz-Menger J
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 170(3):426-33. PubMed ID: 24315151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.
Kidher E; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Xu XY; Athanasiou T
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25488105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bileaflet mechanical aortic valves do not alter ascending aortic wall shear stress.
Farag ES; Schade EL; van Ooij P; Boekholdt SM; Planken RN; van Kimmenade R; Nederveen AJ; de Mol BAJM; Kluin J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):703-710. PubMed ID: 30741363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement alters ascending aortic blood flow and wall shear stress patterns: A 4D flow MRI comparison with age-matched, elderly controls.
Farag ES; Vendrik J; van Ooij P; Poortvliet QL; van Kesteren F; Wollersheim LW; Kaya A; Driessen AHG; Piek JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; Planken RN; Kluin J; Nederveen AJ; de Mol BAJM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1444-1451. PubMed ID: 30132105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic flow after valve sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses reconstruction.
Gaudino M; Piatti F; Lau C; Sturla F; Weinsaft JW; Weltert L; Votta E; Galea N; Chirichilli I; Di Franco A; Francone M; Catalano C; Redaelli A; Girardi LN; De Paulis R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Feb; 157(2):455-465. PubMed ID: 30139642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative Hemodynamic Changes in the Thoracic Aorta in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Prospective Serial 4D-Flow MRI Study.
Kamada H; Ota H; Nakamura M; Imai Y; Ishida S; Sun W; Sakatsume K; Yoshioka I; Saiki Y; Takase K
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020; 32(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31323320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of aortic arch curvature in flow haemodynamics in patients with transposition of the great arteries after arterial switch operation.
Sotelo J; Valverde I; Martins D; Bonnet D; Boddaert N; Pushparajan K; Uribe S; Raimondi F
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Feb; 23(3):402-411. PubMed ID: 33517430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Four-dimensional flow MRI of stented versus stentless aortic valve bioprostheses.
van Kesteren F; Wollersheim LW; Baan J; Nederveen AJ; Kaya A; Boekholdt SM; de Mol BA; van Ooij P; Planken RN
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):257-264. PubMed ID: 28710578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aortic hemodynamics assessment prior and after valve sparing reconstruction: A patient-specific 4D flow-based FSI model.
Nannini G; Caimi A; Palumbo MC; Saitta S; Girardi LN; Gaudino M; Roman MJ; Weinsaft JW; Redaelli A
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Aug; 135():104581. PubMed ID: 34174756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro 4D Flow MRI evaluation of aortic valve replacements reveals disturbed flow distal to biological but not to mechanical valves.
Oechtering TH; Sieren M; Schubert K; Schaller T; Scharfschwerdt M; Panagiotopoulos A; Fujita B; Auer C; Barkhausen J; Ensminger S; Sievers HH; Frydrychowicz A
J Card Surg; 2019 Dec; 34(12):1452-1457. PubMed ID: 31638731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blood flow characteristics after aortic valve neocuspidization in paediatric patients: a comparison with the Ross procedure.
Secinaro A; Milano EG; Ciancarella P; Trezzi M; Capelli C; Ciliberti P; Cetrano E; Curione D; Santangelo TP; Napolitano C; Albanese SB; Carotti A
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jan; 23(2):275-282. PubMed ID: 33550364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study.
Meierhofer C; Schneider EP; Lyko C; Hutter A; Martinoff S; Markl M; Hager A; Hess J; Stern H; Fratz S
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Aug; 14(8):797-804. PubMed ID: 23230276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
