486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34412187)
1. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
Xu S; Zhang H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].
Chen ZZ; Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 25(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 35844123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].
Gao GM; Liu DN; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 31874527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection.
Muhammad S; Jiang Z; Fan T; Tang Q; Hai Y; Ehsan SBE; Bilal M; Zubayraeva AA; Gao Y; He J
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 May; 7(5):e2003. PubMed ID: 38703000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-term efficacy of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for low rectal cancer.
Hu JH; Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Li BH; Lin XH
World J Clin Cases; 2019 Jan; 7(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 30705889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.
Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Lin XH; Hu JH
Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():102-108. PubMed ID: 31362128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.
Ding Y; Li Z; Gao H; Cao Y; Jin W
J BUON; 2019; 24(5):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 31786842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Xu SZ; Wang ZF; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SB; Yan F; Liu GY; Cai JC
Int J Surg; 2024 Mar; 110(3):1402-1410. PubMed ID: 38484259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study.
Li Z; Xiong H; Qiao T; Jiao S; Zhu Y; Wang G; Wang X; Tang Q
BMC Surg; 2022 Jul; 22(1):286. PubMed ID: 35879754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].
Zhou JJ; Li TG; Lei SL; Chen WD; Liu KJ; Liu B; Yao HL
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 32306607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study.
Zhang H; Hu H; Huang R; Guan Z; Zheng M; Xu C; Li Z; Wang Y; Zhang W; Yu L; Jin Y; Tang Q; Wang G; Wang X
Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):599-607. PubMed ID: 34370279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled study].
Chen ZZ; Ding ZJ; Wang ZF; Xu SZ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 26(8):768-772. PubMed ID: 37574293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Propensity score matching-based analysis of short-term outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for left colorectal cancer radical resection].
Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Qiu XF; Yan F; Yuan SS; Cai JC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 May; 96(20):1578-81. PubMed ID: 27266686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Efficacy comparison between laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm using multicenter propensity score matching method].
Wu X; Sun LD; Wang M; Zhang P; Yang ZL; Liang H; Tao KX; Cao H; Xu WT
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 23(9):888-895. PubMed ID: 32927514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of short-term outcomes of transrectal specimen extraction during laparoscopic sigmoid radical resection versus conventional laparoscopically assisted procedure].
Xing J; Zhang C; Yang X; Wang H; Wang H; Yu E; Fu C
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 20(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 28643312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Efficacy analysis of suprapubic single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer].
Liu R; Wang Y; Xiong W; Zhang Z; Deng H; Li G
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 27353098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors.
He J; Yao HB; Wang CJ; Yang QY; Qiu JM; Chen JM; Shen Z; Yang GG
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):215. PubMed ID: 32814583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Specimen extraction through natural orifices with Cai tubes in gastrointestinal surgery: a single-institute series of 234 cases].
Zhuang YF; Xu SZ; Wang ZF; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yan F; Cai JC
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Apr; 26(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 37072313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
