These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34414813)

  • 41. Moving Into the Loop: An Investigation of Drivers' Steering Behavior in Highly Automated Vehicles.
    Alsaid A; Lee JD; Price M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 31180728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of cognitive load on drivers' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control.
    Melnicuk V; Thompson S; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105967. PubMed ID: 33444868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Classification of Drivers' Workload Using Physiological Signals in Conditional Automation.
    Meteier Q; Capallera M; Ruffieux S; Angelini L; Abou Khaled O; Mugellini E; Widmer M; Sonderegger A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():596038. PubMed ID: 33679516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Objective assessment of trait attentional control predicts driver response to emergency failures of vehicular automation.
    Seet M; Dragomir A; Harvy J; Thakor NV; Bezerianos A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106588. PubMed ID: 35182848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation.
    Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Effects of Demands on Hazard Detection Performance.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):474-487. PubMed ID: 30307760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Vision screening of older drivers for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities.
    Desapriya E; Harjee R; Brubacher J; Chan H; Hewapathirane DS; Subzwari S; Pike I
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 2014(2):CD006252. PubMed ID: 24563119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid.
    Beckers N; Siebert LC; Bruijnes M; Jonker C; Abbink D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16193. PubMed ID: 36171437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of task combination on EEG spectrum modulation for driver workload estimation.
    Lei S; Roetting M
    Hum Factors; 2011 Apr; 53(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 21702334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analyzing the Influencing Factors and Workload Variation of Takeover Behavior in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles.
    Zhang H; Zhang Y; Xiao Y; Wu C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving.
    Gonçalves RC; Louw TL; Madigan R; Quaresma M; Romano R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Advanced vehicle technologies and road safety: A scoping review of the evidence.
    Furlan AD; Kajaks T; Tiong M; Lavallière M; Campos JL; Babineau J; Haghzare S; Ma T; Vrkljan B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105741. PubMed ID: 32979820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Driving-Induced Neurological Biomarkers in an Advanced Driver-Assistance System.
    Hussain I; Young S; Park SJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessing the physiological effect of non-driving-related task performance and task modality in conditionally automated driving systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Coyne R; Ryan L; Moustafa M; Smeaton AF; Corcoran P; Walsh JC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107243. PubMed ID: 37651857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluate driver response to active warning system in level-2 automated vehicles.
    Atwood JR; Guo F; Blanco M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():132-138. PubMed ID: 31005004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.