These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34415575)

  • 1. The effect of familiarity on within-person age judgements from voices.
    Lavan N
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 113(1):287-299. PubMed ID: 34415575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does familiarity with a voice affect trait judgements?
    Lavan N; Mileva M; McGettigan C
    Br J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 112(1):282-300. PubMed ID: 32445499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Familiarity and task context shape the use of acoustic information in voice identity perception.
    Lavan N; Kreitewolf J; Obleser J; McGettigan C
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104780. PubMed ID: 34298232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How many voices did you hear? Natural variability disrupts identity perception from unfamiliar voices.
    Lavan N; Burston LFK; Garrido L
    Br J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 110(3):576-593. PubMed ID: 30221374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'Please sort these voice recordings into 2 identities': Effects of task instructions on performance in voice sorting studies.
    Lavan N; Merriman SE; Ladwa P; Burston LFK; Knight S; McGettigan C
    Br J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 111(3):556-569. PubMed ID: 31328792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Highly accurate and robust identity perception from personally familiar voices.
    Kanber E; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Apr; 151(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 34672658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breaking voice identity perception: Expressive voices are more confusable for listeners.
    Lavan N; Burston LF; Ladwa P; Merriman SE; Knight S; McGettigan C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2240-2248. PubMed ID: 30808271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain mechanism of unfamiliar and familiar voice processing: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.
    Sun Y; Ming L; Sun J; Guo F; Li Q; Hu X
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14976. PubMed ID: 36935917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.
    Plante-Hébert J; Boucher VJ; Jemel B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250214. PubMed ID: 33861789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker and accent familiarity yield advantages for voice identity perception: A voice sorting study.
    Njie S; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):175-187. PubMed ID: 35274221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left-handed voices? Examining the perceptual learning of novel person characteristics from the voice.
    Lavan N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Feb; ():17470218241228849. PubMed ID: 38229446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language-familiarity effect on voice recognition by blind listeners.
    Zhang L; Li Y; Zhou H; Zhang Y; Shu H
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 May; 1(5):055201. PubMed ID: 36154110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility benefit for familiar voices is not accompanied by better discrimination of fundamental frequency or vocal tract length.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108704. PubMed ID: 36701896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model for person perception from familiar and unfamiliar voices.
    Lavan N; McGettigan C
    Commun Psychol; 2023; 1(1):1. PubMed ID: 38665246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The temporal lobes differentiate between the voices of famous and unknown people: an event-related fMRI study on speaker recognition.
    Bethmann A; Scheich H; Brechmann A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47626. PubMed ID: 23112826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Listeners Hear Who Is Singing? The Role of Familiarity.
    Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):638.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26272537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.