These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34415704)

  • 1. Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly BMath TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Sep; 479(9):2108-2109. PubMed ID: 34415704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter to the Editor: Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Girard J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jul; 479(7):1632-1633. PubMed ID: 34038390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter to the Editor: Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Walter WL; Beaulé PE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 479(6):1404-1405. PubMed ID: 33729183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CORR Insights®: Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Gjertsen JE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2637-2639. PubMed ID: 32925242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?
    Corten K; MacDonald SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):351-7. PubMed ID: 20012720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Harris I; Lorimer MF; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty.
    de Steiger RN; Miller LN; Prosser GH; Graves SE; Davidson DC; Stanford TE
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 20170416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Outcome of Cemented Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Defines a Proficiency Threshold: Results of 22,956 Cases From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hanly RJ; Whitehouse SL; Lorimer MF; de Steiger RN; Timperley AJ; Crawford RW; van Bavel D
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1711-1717. PubMed ID: 31031154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
    Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in young patients: international high-volume centres' report on the outcome of 11,382 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties in patients ⩽50 years at surgery.
    Van Der Straeten C;
    Hip Int; 2022 May; 32(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32905713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Smith AJ; Dieppe P; Howard PW; Blom AW;
    Lancet; 2012 Nov; 380(9855):1759-66. PubMed ID: 23036895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Osteoarthritis of Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Primary Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Cemented All-polyethylene Glenoid: Analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Gill DRJ; Page BMedSci RS; Graves SE; Rainbird S; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 479(10):2216-2224. PubMed ID: 34180871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Lorimer M; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):464-481. PubMed ID: 34677162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cemented Polished Tapered Stems Have Lower Revision Rates Than Commonly Used Cementless Implant up to 17 Years of Follow-Up: An Analysis of 201,889 Total Hip Replacements From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Babazadeh S; de Steiger RN; Holder C; van Bavel D
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jan; 37(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 34592358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of femoral head size on metal-on-HXLPE hip arthroplasty outcome in a combined analysis of six national and regional registries.
    Allepuz A; Havelin L; Barber T; Sedrakyan A; Graves S; Bordini B; Hoeffel D; Cafri G; Paxton E
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):12-8. PubMed ID: 25520414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
    Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis.
    Heintzbergen S; Kulin NA; Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM; Werle J; Khong H; Marshall DA
    Value Health; 2013; 16(6):942-52. PubMed ID: 24041344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.