161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34415858)
1. Applying Computerized Adaptive Testing to the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module: Individualizing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Facial Surgery.
Ottenhof MJ; Geerards D; Harrison C; Klassen AF; Hoogbergen MM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Lee EH; Pusic AL; Sidey-Gibbons CJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Oct; 148(4):863-869. PubMed ID: 34415858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Streamlining the Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Weight Loss and Body Contouring Patients: Applying Computerized Adaptive Testing to the BODY-Q.
Geerards D; Klassen AF; Hoogbergen MM; van der Hulst RRWJ; van den Berg L; Pusic AL; Gibbons CJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):946e-955e. PubMed ID: 31033817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module for measuring patient-reported outcomes following facial skin cancer surgery.
Lee EH; Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Nehal KS; Pusic AL
Br J Dermatol; 2018 Jul; 179(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 29654700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Patient-Reported Outcome Measures In Skin Cancer Reconstruction (PROMISCR) study: Anglicisation and initial validation of the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module in a UK cohort.
Dobbs TD; Ottenhof M; Gibson JAG; Whitaker IS; Hutchings HA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Mar; 74(3):615-624. PubMed ID: 33127351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. UK-based prospective cohort study to anglicise and validate the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module in patients with facial skin cancer undergoing surgical reconstruction: the PROMISCR (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Skin Cancer Reconstruction) study.
Dobbs T; Hutchings HA; Whitaker IS
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016182. PubMed ID: 28947443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introducing BREAST-Q Computerized Adaptive Testing: Short and Individualized Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment following Reconstructive Breast Surgery.
Young-Afat DA; Gibbons C; Klassen AF; Vickers AJ; Cano SJ; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3):679-684. PubMed ID: 30589822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Construct validity of the anglicised FACE-Q skin cancer module.
Dobbs TD; Harrison CJ; Ottenhof MJ; Gibson JAG; Matin RN; Rodrigues JN; Hutchings HA; Whitaker IS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 May; 75(5):1644-1652. PubMed ID: 34955401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Appearance-related psychosocial distress following facial skin cancer surgery using the FACE-Q Skin Cancer.
Vaidya TS; Mori S; Dusza SW; Rossi AM; Nehal KS; Lee EH
Arch Dermatol Res; 2019 Nov; 311(9):691-696. PubMed ID: 31338583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To see or not to see: Impact of viewing facial skin cancer defects prior to reconstruction.
Veldhuizen IJ; Lee EH; Kurtansky NR; van Hensbergen LJ; Dusza SW; Hölscher MC; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ottenhof MJ; Pusic AL; Hoogbergen MM
Arch Dermatol Res; 2021 Dec; 313(10):847-853. PubMed ID: 33515277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q.
Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Scott A; Snell L; Pusic AL
Facial Plast Surg; 2010 Aug; 26(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 20665408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and Psychometric Validation of the FACE-Q Skin, Lips, and Facial Rhytids Appearance Scales and Adverse Effects Checklists for Cosmetic Procedures.
Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Schwitzer JA; Baker SB; Carruthers A; Carruthers J; Chapas A; Pusic AL
JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Apr; 152(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 26934294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerised adaptive testing accurately predicts CLEFT-Q scores by selecting fewer, more patient-focused questions.
Harrison CJ; Geerards D; Ottenhof MJ; Klassen AF; Riff KWYW; Swan MC; Pusic AL; Sidey-Gibbons CJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Nov; 72(11):1819-1824. PubMed ID: 31358447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient Expectations Influence Postoperative Facial Satisfaction Measured by the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module: A Pilot Study.
Blank NR; Giordano CN; Dusza S; Nehal K; Lee EH
Dermatol Surg; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1113-1115. PubMed ID: 31306272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate treatments for acne and acne scarring: the ACNE-Q.
Klassen AF; Lipner S; O'Malley M; Longmire NM; Cano SJ; Breitkopf T; Rae C; Zhang YL; Pusic AL
Br J Dermatol; 2019 Dec; 181(6):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 30977918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FACE-Q craniofacial module: Part 2 Psychometric properties of newly developed scales for children and young adults with facial conditions.
Klassen AF; Rae C; Riff W; Denadai R; Murray DJ; Bracken S; Courtemanche DJ; Bulstrode N; O'Hara J; Butler D; Goldstein J; Tassi A; Hol ML; Johnson D; Ganske IM; Kölby L; Benitez S; Breuning EE; Malic CC; Allen GC; Pusic AL; Cano S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2330-2340. PubMed ID: 34172403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Development, Deployment, and Evaluation of the CLEFT-Q Computerized Adaptive Test: A Multimethods Approach Contributing to Personalized, Person-Centered Health Assessments in Plastic Surgery.
Harrison C; Apon I; Ardouin K; Sidey-Gibbons C; Klassen A; Cano S; Wong Riff K; Pusic A; Versnel S; Koudstaal M; Allori AC; Rogers-Vizena C; Swan MC; Furniss D; Rodrigues J
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e41870. PubMed ID: 37104031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimising the computerised adaptive test to reliably reduce the burden of administering the CLEFT-Q: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Harrison CJ; Rodrigues JN; Furniss D; Swan MC; Klassen AF; Wong Riff KWY; Sidey-Gibbons CJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jun; 74(6):1355-1401. PubMed ID: 33376081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analog Scale.
Panchapakesan V; Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Scott AM; Pusic AL
Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Nov; 33(8):1099-109. PubMed ID: 24243890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation.
Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Schwitzer JA; Scott AM; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):375-386. PubMed ID: 25626785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-Reported Aesthetic and Psychosocial Outcomes After Microvascular Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer.
Zebolsky AL; Patel N; Heaton CM; Park AM; Seth R; Knott PD
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Dec; 147(12):1035-1044. PubMed ID: 34292310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
