These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34416359)

  • 21. Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States.
    Kruse J; Toledo P; Belton TB; Testani EJ; Evans CT; Grobman WA; Miller ES; Lange EMS
    Am J Infect Control; 2021 Jun; 49(6):690-693. PubMed ID: 33259825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Information quality and dynamics of patients' interactions on tonsillectomy web resources.
    Arsenault M; Blouin MJ; Guitton MJ
    Internet Interv; 2016 May; 4():99-104. PubMed ID: 30135795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Gobbledygook in Online Parent-Focused Information about Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
    Wozney L; Radomski AD; Newton AS
    Health Commun; 2018 Jun; 33(6):710-715. PubMed ID: 28402141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interrater reliability of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT).
    Vishnevetsky J; Walters CB; Tan KS
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Mar; 101(3):490-496. PubMed ID: 28899713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.
    Harris VC; Links AR; Hong P; Walsh J; Schoo DP; Tunkel DE; Stewart CM; Boss EF
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 28842989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.
    Kapoor K; George P; Evans MC; Miller WJ; Liu SS
    Cardiology; 2017; 138(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 28571004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Appraisal of Printed Online Education Materials on Spasmodic Dysphonia.
    Alwani MM; Campa KA; Svenstrup TJ; Bandali EH; Anthony BP
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):659.e1-659.e9. PubMed ID: 31883851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
    Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.
    Roberts H; Zhang D; Dyer GS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e70. PubMed ID: 27605695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Gynecomastia.
    Nnamani Silva ON; Ammanuel SG; Segobiano BM; Edwards CS; Hoffman WY
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Aug; 87(2):123-125. PubMed ID: 33346559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients.
    Bonner C; Patel P; Fajardo MA; Zhuang R; Trevena L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e025173. PubMed ID: 30872547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability.
    Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM
    Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to uterine artery embolization.
    Shukla P; Sanghvi SP; Lelkes VM; Kumar A; Contractor S
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 23452554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Readability of Printed Online Education Materials on Pituitary Tumors: Untangling a Web of Complexity.
    Ye MJ; Alwani MM; Harper JL; Buren LMV; Bandali EH; Illing EA; Shipchandler TZ; Ting JY
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2020 Nov; 34(6):759-766. PubMed ID: 32460599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Health Communication Assessment of Web-based Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patient Education Materials.
    Robbins R; Dudley KA; Monten KN; Le C; Hanes S; Patel SR; Bertisch SM
    ATS Sch; 2022 Mar; 3(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 35634002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the health literacy demand and cultural appropriateness of online immunisation information available to refugee and migrant communities in Australia.
    Abdi I; Murphy B; Seale H
    Vaccine; 2020 Sep; 38(41):6410-6417. PubMed ID: 32800630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.