BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34417866)

  • 1. Advantages of robotic abdominoperineal resection compared with laparoscopic surgery: a single-center retrospective study.
    Kasai S; Kagawa H; Shiomi A; Hino H; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Kato S; Hanaoka M; Kinugasa Y
    Surg Today; 2022 Apr; 52(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 34417866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China.
    Qi X; Liu M; Tan F; Xu K; Yao Z; Zhang N; Yang H; Zhang C; Xing J; Cui M; Su X
    Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():158-165. PubMed ID: 31526895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):721-728. PubMed ID: 26092002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.
    Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trans-perineal minimally invasive surgery during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.
    Yasukawa D; Hori T; Kadokawa Y; Kato S; Aisu Y; Hasegawa S
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 29987569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with partial preservation of Denonvilliers fascia: a comparative study of short-term efficacy and urinary and erectile function].
    Huang ZK; Chi P; Huang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 24(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 33878822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections for low rectal cancer: A single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Feng Q; Tang W; Zhang Z; Wei Y; Ren L; Chang W; Zhu D; Liang F; He G; Xu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 126(8):1481-1493. PubMed ID: 36036889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer for overweight and obese patients].
    Gao GM; Chen L; Tang HC; Zhu WQ; Huang ZX; Wang DD; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 24(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 33461255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive multivisceral resection for T4b rectal cancer: A 9-year review.
    Chan KS; Liu B; Tan MNA; How KY; Wong KY
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar; 16(3):777-789. PubMed ID: 38577068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
    Gorgun E; Ozben V; Costedio M; Stocchi L; Kalady M; Remzi F
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.