These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34417866)
1. Advantages of robotic abdominoperineal resection compared with laparoscopic surgery: a single-center retrospective study. Kasai S; Kagawa H; Shiomi A; Hino H; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Kato S; Hanaoka M; Kinugasa Y Surg Today; 2022 Apr; 52(4):643-651. PubMed ID: 34417866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J; Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer. Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis]. Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China. Qi X; Liu M; Tan F; Xu K; Yao Z; Zhang N; Yang H; Zhang C; Xing J; Cui M; Su X Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():158-165. PubMed ID: 31526895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial]. Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):721-728. PubMed ID: 26092002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study. Boutros M; Hippalgaonkar N; Silva E; Allende D; Wexner SD; Berho M Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 23652740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center. Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trans-perineal minimally invasive surgery during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Yasukawa D; Hori T; Kadokawa Y; Kato S; Aisu Y; Hasegawa S Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 29987569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with partial preservation of Denonvilliers fascia: a comparative study of short-term efficacy and urinary and erectile function]. Huang ZK; Chi P; Huang Y Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 24(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 33878822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching]. Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients. Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer. Law WL; Foo DCC Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis. Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer for overweight and obese patients]. Gao GM; Chen L; Tang HC; Zhu WQ; Huang ZX; Wang DD; Li TY Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 24(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 33461255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive multivisceral resection for T4b rectal cancer: A 9-year review. Chan KS; Liu B; Tan MNA; How KY; Wong KY World J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar; 16(3):777-789. PubMed ID: 38577068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients. Gorgun E; Ozben V; Costedio M; Stocchi L; Kalady M; Remzi F Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]