These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34418124)

  • 21. Evaluation of Tablet-Based Tests of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Older Adults.
    Varadaraj V; Assi L; Gajwani P; Wahl M; David J; Swenor BK; Ehrlich JR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 33185485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in Zaire.
    Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo D; Spileers W; Missotten L
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1996; 263():87-90. PubMed ID: 9396193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.
    Richman J; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Spaeth GL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 25053760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Assessment of mesopic and contrast vision for driving licences: which cut-off values, which methods are appropriate?].
    Wilhelm H; Peters T; Durst W; Roelcke S; Quast R; Hütten M; Wilhelm B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Nov; 230(11):1106-13. PubMed ID: 24190829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Ohio Contrast Cards: Visual Performance in a Pediatric Low-vision Site.
    Hopkins GR; Dougherty BE; Brown AM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):946-956. PubMed ID: 28972542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The SPARCS: a novel assessment of contrast sensitivity and its reliability in patients with corrected refractive error.
    Sun Y; Erdem E; Lyu A; Zangalli C; Wizov SS; Lo D; Spaeth EE; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 100(10):1421-6. PubMed ID: 26758536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrast sensitivity and glare in cataract using the Pelli-Robson chart.
    Williamson TH; Strong NP; Sparrow J; Aggarwal RK; Harrad R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 76(12):719-22. PubMed ID: 1486072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract.
    Gupta L; Cvintal V; Delvadia R; Sun Y; Erdem E; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Richman J; Spaeth E; Spaeth GL
    Eye (Lond); 2017 May; 31(5):753-761. PubMed ID: 28106888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Design and validation of a chart-based measure of the limits of spatial contrast sensitivity.
    Adhikari P; Carter DD; Feigl B; Zele AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Jan; 42(1):110-122. PubMed ID: 34755353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical report: Virtual reality enables comparable contrast sensitivity measurements to in-office testing (pilot study).
    Cheng CP; Serafini RA; Labkovich M; Warburton AJ; Navarro V; Shaik N; Reddy H; Chelnis JG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2024 Feb; 101(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 38408310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intersession repeatability of contrast sensitivity scores in age-related macular degeneration.
    Patel PJ; Chen FK; Rubin GS; Tufail A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2621-5. PubMed ID: 19218618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Effect of Test Distance on Visual Contrast Sensitivity Measured Using the Pelli-Robson Chart.
    Njeru SM; Osman M; Brown AM
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 10(2):32. PubMed ID: 34003917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity chart.
    Haymes SA; Chen J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):308-16. PubMed ID: 15181355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia.
    Bradley A; Hook J; Haeseker J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Jul; 11(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 1766685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Value of Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart for evaluation of visual system in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Wender M
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2007; 41(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 17530576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Remote Monitoring of Visual Function in Patients with Maculopathy: The Aphelion Study.
    Joseph A; Bullimore M; Drawnel F; Miranda M; Morgan Z; Wang YZ
    Ophthalmol Ther; 2024 Jan; 13(1):409-422. PubMed ID: 38015309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability and consistency of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures in advanced eye disease.
    Kiser AK; Mladenovich D; Eshraghi F; Bourdeau D; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):946-54. PubMed ID: 16317369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital contrast sensitivity chart with varying visual acuity: Development and validation.
    Hegde PG; Rao D; Prudhvi B; Hegde N
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(3):467-471. PubMed ID: 38059109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Repeatability and intercorrelations of standard vision tests as a function of age.
    Lovie-Kitchin JE; Brown B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Aug; 77(8):412-20. PubMed ID: 10966067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simple clinical techniques to evaluate visual function in patients with early cataract.
    Elliott DB; Hurst MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 67(11):822-5. PubMed ID: 2250890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.