138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34418627)
1. Plant-wide investigation of sulfur flows in a water resource recovery facility (WRRF).
Forouzanmehr F; Le QH; Solon K; Maisonnave V; Daniel O; Buffiere P; Gillot S; Volcke EIP
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 801():149530. PubMed ID: 34418627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Opportunities for reducing coagulants usage in urban water management: The Oxley Creek Sewage Collection and Treatment System as an example.
Salehin S; Kulandaivelu J; Rebosura M; Khan W; Wong R; Jiang G; Smith P; McPhee P; Howard C; Sharma K; Keller J; Donose BC; Yuan Z; Pikaar I
Water Res; 2019 Nov; 165():114996. PubMed ID: 31465996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of sludge management strategies in wastewater treatment systems using a plant-wide approach.
Flores-Alsina X; Ramin E; Ikumi D; Harding T; Batstone D; Brouckaert C; Sotemann S; Gernaey KV
Water Res; 2021 Feb; 190():116714. PubMed ID: 33307375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploitation of the ADM1 in a XXI century wastewater resource recovery facility (WRRF): The case of codigestion and thermal hydrolysis.
Donoso-Bravo A; Olivares D; Lesty Y; Bossche HV
Water Res; 2020 May; 175():115654. PubMed ID: 32146207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sulfur flows and biosolids processing: Using Material Flux Analysis (MFA) principles at wastewater treatment plants.
Fisher RM; Alvarez-Gaitan JP; Stuetz RM; Moore SJ
J Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 198(Pt 1):153-162. PubMed ID: 28458109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sulfur transformations during two-stage anaerobic digestion and intermediate thermal hydrolysis.
Forouzanmehr F; Solon K; Maisonnave V; Daniel O; Volcke EIP; Gillot S; Buffiere P
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 810():151247. PubMed ID: 34710429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of food waste and relevant air quality implications.
Kuo J; Dow J
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Sep; 67(9):1000-1011. PubMed ID: 28498738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrating dairy manure for enhanced resource recovery at a WRRF: Environmental life cycle and pilot-scale analyses.
Bryant C; Coats ER
Water Environ Res; 2021 Oct; 93(10):2034-2050. PubMed ID: 33877720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prioritize effluent quality, operational costs or global warming? - Using predictive control of wastewater aeration for flexible management of objectives in WRRFs.
Stentoft PA; Munk-Nielsen T; Møller JK; Madsen H; Valverde-Pérez B; Mikkelsen PS; Vezzaro L
Water Res; 2021 May; 196():116960. PubMed ID: 33740729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resource recovery from sulphate-rich sewage through an innovative anaerobic-based water resource recovery facility (WRRF).
Seco A; Aparicio S; González-Camejo J; Jiménez-Benítez A; Mateo O; Mora JF; Noriega-Hevia G; Sanchis-Perucho P; Serna-García R; Zamorano-López N; Giménez JB; Ruiz-Martínez A; Aguado D; Barat R; Borrás L; Bouzas A; Martí N; Pachés M; Ribes J; Robles A; Ruano MV; Serralta J; Ferrer J
Water Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 78(9):1925-1936. PubMed ID: 30566096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plant-wide modelling of phosphorus transformations in wastewater treatment systems: Impacts of control and operational strategies.
Solon K; Flores-Alsina X; Kazadi Mbamba C; Ikumi D; Volcke EIP; Vaneeckhaute C; Ekama G; Vanrolleghem PA; Batstone DJ; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U
Water Res; 2017 Apr; 113():97-110. PubMed ID: 28199867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic, technical, and environmental evaluation of retrofitting scenarios in a full-scale industrial wastewater treatment system.
Monje V; Owsianiak M; Junicke H; Kjellberg K; Gernaey KV; Flores-Alsina X
Water Res; 2022 Sep; 223():118997. PubMed ID: 36029698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling the dynamic performance of full-scale anaerobic primary sludge digester using Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1).
Ersahin ME
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2018 Oct; 41(10):1539-1545. PubMed ID: 30003379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model development and evaluation of methane potential from anaerobic co-digestion of municipal wastewater sludge and un-dewatered grease trap waste.
Yalcinkaya S; Malina JF
Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():53-62. PubMed ID: 25818384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of direct waste-activated sludge dewatering benefits and costs in a water resource recovery facility.
Mentzer C; Drinkwater M; Pagilla KR
Water Environ Res; 2021 Dec; 93(12):2998-3010. PubMed ID: 34606145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Co-digestion of municipal sludge and external organic wastes for enhanced biogas production under realistic plant constraints.
Tandukar M; Pavlostathis SG
Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():432-45. PubMed ID: 25979784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Full-scale semi-centralized wastewater treatment facilities for resource recovery: operation, problems and resolutions.
Tang X; Wen Y; He Y; Jiang H; Dai X; Bi X; Wagner M; Chen H
Water Sci Technol; 2020 Jul; 82(2):303-314. PubMed ID: 32941172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fluorochemical mass flows in a municipal wastewater treatment facility.
Schultz MM; Higgins CP; Huset CA; Luthy RG; Barofsky DF; Field JA
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Dec; 40(23):7350-7. PubMed ID: 17180988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a novel process for the biological conversion of H2S and methanethiol to elemental sulfur.
Sipma J; Janssen AJ; Pol LW; Lettinga G
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Apr; 82(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 12569619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
