These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34418647)

  • 1. The challenge of comparing digitally captured signatures registered with different software and hardware.
    Zimmer J; Kalantzis N; Dziedzic T; Heckeroth J; Kupferschmid E; Fernandes C; Geistová Čakovská B; Branco MJ; Axelsson Spjuth K; Vaccarone P; Kerkhoff A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110945. PubMed ID: 34418647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations for capturing signatures digitally to optimize their suitability for forensic handwriting examination.
    Geistová Čakovská B; Kalantzis N; Dziedzic T; Fernandes C; Zimmer J; Branco MJ; Heckeroth J; Spjuth KA; Kupferschmid E; Vaccarone P; Kerkoff A
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Mar; 66(2):743-747. PubMed ID: 33206397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Features of digitally captured signatures vs. pen and paper signatures: Similar or completely different?
    Heckeroth J; Kupferschmid E; Dziedzic T; Kalantzis N; Geistová Čakovská B; Fernandes C; Branco MJ; Axelsson Spjuth K; Kerkhoff A; Vaccarone P; Zimmer J; Schmidt P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110587. PubMed ID: 33248328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digitally captured signatures: A method for the normalization of force through calibration and the use of the zeta function.
    Kalantzis N; Platt AWG
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):651-668. PubMed ID: 34729778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining Authenticity: An Initial Exploration of the Suitability of Handwritten Electronic Signatures.
    Heckeroth J; Boywitt CD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():144-154. PubMed ID: 28364722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The potential of collaborative learning as a tool for forensic students: Application to signature examination.
    Cadola L; Hochholdinger S; Bannwarth A; Voisard R; Marquis R; Weyermann C
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):273-283. PubMed ID: 32381244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic characteristics of signatures: effects of writer style on genuine and simulated signatures.
    Mohammed L; Found B; Caligiuri M; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25420668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian evaluation of dynamic signatures in operational conditions.
    Jacques L; Silvia B; Raymond M; Franco T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Mar; 332():111173. PubMed ID: 35066400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signature dynamics in Alzheimer's disease.
    Caligiuri MP; Mohammed L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109880. PubMed ID: 31390576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarking desktop and mobile handwriting across COTS devices: The e-BioSign biometric database.
    Tolosana R; Vera-Rodriguez R; Fierrez J; Morales A; Ortega-Garcia J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176792. PubMed ID: 28475590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Lying Body Position on Handwriting.
    Dziedzic T
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61 Suppl 1():S177-83. PubMed ID: 26399704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic signatures: A review of dynamic feature variation and forensic methodology.
    Linden J; Marquis R; Bozza S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():216-229. PubMed ID: 30241096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of extrinsic motivation on signature authorship opinions in forensic signature blind trials.
    Dewhurst TN; Found B; Ballantyne KN; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():127-32. PubMed ID: 24529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-identification of electronically scanned signatures (ESS) and digitally constructed signatures (DCS).
    Kazmierczyk Z; Turner IJ
    Forensic Sci Res; 2022; 7(2):261-264. PubMed ID: 35784431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the lexical morphology of Western handwritten signatures.
    Diaz-Cabrera M; Ferrer MA; Morales A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123254. PubMed ID: 25860942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of time on dynamic signature: An exploratory data analysis.
    Linden J; Marquis R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111577. PubMed ID: 37148783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The probative character of Forensic Handwriting Examiners' identification and elimination opinions on questioned signatures.
    Found B; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jun; 178(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18367353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic examination of effects of Parkinsonism on various handwriting characteristics.
    Kaur M; Saini K
    Sci Justice; 2022 Jan; 62(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 35033322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Characteristics between Electronic Signature and Conventional Signature Based on Computer Vision Technology.
    Feng C; Ji Z; Zhang J
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():4965908. PubMed ID: 35795766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Score-based likelihood ratios for handwriting evidence.
    Hepler AB; Saunders CP; Davis LJ; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):129-40. PubMed ID: 22297142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.